Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29680200›Full record

ReviewVaccine2019

Biological feasibility and importance of a gonorrhea vaccine for global public health.

Leah R Vincent, Ann E Jerse

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Computer-aided genomic data analysis of drug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Infection With the US Neisseria meningitidis Urethritis Clade Does Not Lower Future Risk of Urethral Gonorrhea.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah R VincentNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, United States. Electronic address: leah.vincent@nih.gov.
Ann E JerseDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology F. Edward Herbert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20854, United States. Electronic address: ann.jerse1@usuhs.edu.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

The Atlantic Coast Sexually Transmitted Infection Cooperative Research Center (ACU19AI113170 · NIAID · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI JERSE, ANN E. · 2014 to 2018
$6.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI113170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing public health interest in controlling sexually transmitted infections (STIs) through vaccination due to increasing recognition of the global disease burden of STIs and the role of STIs in women's reproductive health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the health and well-being of neonates. Neisseria gonorrhoeae has historically challenged vaccine development through the expression of phase and antigenically variable surface molecules and its capacity to cause repeated infections without inducing protective immunity. An estimated 78 million new N. gonorrhoeae infections occur annually and the greatest disease burden is carried by low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Current control measures are clearly inadequate and threatened by the rapid emergence of antibiotic resistance. The gonococcus now holds the status of "super-bug" as there is currently no single reliable monotherapy for empirical treatment of gonorrhea. The problem of antibiotic resistance has elevated treatment costs and necessitated the establishment of large surveillance programs to track the spread of resistant strains. Here we review the need for a gonorrhea vaccine with respect to global disease burden and related socioeconomic and treatment costs, with an emphasis on the impact of gonorrhea on women and newborns. We also highlight the challenge of estimating the impact of a gonorrhea vaccine due to the need for more data on the burden of gonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease and related sequelae and of gonorrhea-associated adverse pregnancy outcomes and the problem of empirical diagnosis and treatment of STIs in LMIC. There is also a lack of clinical and basic science research in the area of gonococcal/chlamydia coinfection, which occurs in a high percentage of individuals with gonorrhea and should be considered when testing the efficacy of gonorrhea vaccines. Finally, we review recent research that suggests a gonorrhea vaccine is feasible and discuss challenges and research gaps in gonorrhea vaccine development.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsCoinfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaePelvic Inflammatory DiseasePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPublic HealthAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesAntibiotic resistanceGonorrheaInfertilityOphthalmia neonatorumPelvic inflammatory diseaseVaccine

Identifiers

PMID29680200
PMCPMC6892272
OpenAlexW2801734974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.