Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29679983›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of bacterial DNA directly in blood of preterm neonates with suspected late-onset sepsis.

Marre van den Brand, Frank A M van den Dungen, Martine P Bos, Mirjam M van Weissenbruch, A Marceline van Furth, Annemieke de Lange, Anna Rubenjan, Remco P H Peters, Paul H M Savelkoul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marre van den BrandDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. marre.vandenbrand@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-4978
Frank A M van den DungenDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martine P BosMicrobiome Ltd., De Boelelaan 1108, 1081HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirjam M van WeissenbruchDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A Marceline van FurthDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemieke de LangeDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna RubenjanDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Remco P H PetersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road and Roper Street, Hatfield, South Africa.
Paul H M SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

Fonds NutsOhra 0901-042 & 1101-093ZonMw (NL) 205 100 007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid and accurate diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is highly warranted because of high associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a novel multiplex PCR assay for diagnosis of late-onset sepsis and to investigate the value of bacterial DNA load (BDL) determination as a measure of infection severity.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit. Preterm and/or very low birth weight infants suspected for late-onset sepsis were included. Upon suspicion of sepsis, a whole blood sample was drawn for multiplex PCR to detect the eight most common bacteria causing neonatal sepsis, as well as for blood culture. BDL was determined in episodes with a positive multiplex PCR.

resultsIn total, 91 episodes of suspected sepsis were investigated, and PCR was positive in 53 (58%) and blood culture in 60 (66%) episodes, yielding no significant difference in detection rate (p = 0.17). Multiplex PCR showed a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 87%, and negative predictive value of 68% compared with blood culture. Episodes with discordant results of PCR and blood culture included mainly detection of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). C-reactive protein (CRP) level and immature to total neutrophil (I/T) ratio were lower in these episodes, indicating less severe disease or even contamination. Median BDL was high (4.1 log

conclusionsMultiplex PCR provides a powerful assay to enhance rapid identification of the causative pathogen in late-onset sepsis. BDL measurement may be a useful indicator of severity of infection.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadBlood CultureCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMaleNetherlandsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSepsisDNA, BacterialBacteremiaBacterial DNA loadLate-onset sepsisMolecular diagnosisNeonatologyReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID29679983
PMCPMC5911371
OpenAlexW2800782410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.