Trial reportObesity surgery2018
LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of bariatric surgery on obesity associated gastroesophageal reflux disease: Insights from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Primary and Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and GRADE-Based IFSO Position Statement.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the Landscape of Marginal Ulcers After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Incidence, Regional Trends, and Treatment Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OBESITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Does One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Expose Patients to Gastroesophageal Reflux: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Pooled it
- Marginal Ulcers Following One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Guideline
- Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Metabolic Operation for Patients with Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/mObesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- [Evidence of the Mini-/One-anastomosis-gastric-Bypass for being a standard procedure in obesity and metabolic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Pooled it
- LSG vs OAGB: 7-Year Follow-up Data of a Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Outcome Based on BAROS Score.Obesity surgery · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of reflux following sleeve gastrectomy and one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year results from a randomized open-label controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- LSG vs MGB-OAGB: 5-Year Follow-up Data and Comparative Outcome of the Two Procedures over Long Term-Results of a Randomised Control Trial.Obesity surgery · 2021Trial
- Scoping Review of Reflux after Primary One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Navigating the Maze to Enhance the Evidence Base.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and the Risk of De Novo or Persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Comparative Study with ≥ 7 Years Follow-Up.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe objective of this study is to compare 3-year follow-up results of one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective randomised study of results between 100 LSG patients and 101 MGB-OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life (BAROS score) at 3 years follow-up.
resultsFollow-up was achieved in 93 MGB-OAGB vs 92 LSG patients for 3-year period. The average %EWL for MGB-OAGB vs LSG was 66.48 vs 61.15% at the end of 3 years respectively, which was statistically insignificant. Diabetes remission was seen in 89.13% of MGB-OAGB patients and 81.82% of LSG patients. Remission of hypertension was seen in 74% of MGB-OAGB patients and 72.22% of LSG patients. Bariatric analysis reporting and outcome system (BAROS) with comorbidity in LSG patients and MGB-OAGB patients was 6.03 and 6.96 respectively, whereas in patients without comorbidity, BAROS score was 3.86 in LSG group and 4.34 in MGB-OAGB group.
conclusionsIn our study, at 36 months follow up, there was no significant difference between LSG and MGB-OAGB in %EWL and remission of HTN. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rates were higher after MGB-OAGB as compared to LSG but the difference was statistically insignificant. MGB-OAGB patients with comorbidities have a better quality of life and BAROS score compared to LSG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29679336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.