Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29679246›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers.

Christine Lohr, Klaus-Michael Braumann, Ruediger Reer, Jan Schroeder, Tobias Schmidt

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05335330 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Trimester-Specific Normative Values of Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Thoracolumbar Fascia in Pregnant Women

TypeobservationalSponsorSultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyRan2022 to 2024Enrolled145ConditionsPregnant Women, First PregnancyArmsEvaluation of biomechanics and viscoelastic properties of Thoracolumbar fascia
NCT05403424 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Thoracolumbar Fascia in Pregnant Women With Pelvic Girdle Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorSultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyRan2022 to 2025Enrolled103ConditionsPregnant Women, Pelvic Girdle PainArmsEvaluation of pain, Application of pelvic girdle diagnostic tests, Evaluation of biomechanics and viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia, Evaluation of activity limitation
NCT05607212 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Tensiomyography and Pressure Algometry: Assessing the Effects of an Acute Bout of Kettlebell Swings on Muscle Sensitivity and Pressure Pain Threshold.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Central FloridaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsMuscle Soreness, Muscle Weakness, Muscle TendernessArmsKettlebell Swing, Isometric Hold, Control
NCT06399497 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Lumbar Spinal Manipulation on Muscle Mechanical Properties, Pressure Pain Threshold and Mechanical Perception Threshold in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de CórdobaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsLow Back PainArmsspinal manipulation, simulated manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Standing and Sitting Postures on Spinal Curvature and Muscle Mechanical Properties in Young Women: A Photogrammetric and MyotonPro Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine LohrOsteopathic Praxis, Eppendorfer Landstraße 42, 20249, Hamburg, Germany. praxis@christinelohr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8690-8858
Klaus-Michael BraumannDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty for Psychology and Human Movement Science, Institute for Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, 20148, Hamburg, Germany.
Ruediger ReerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty for Psychology and Human Movement Science, Institute for Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, 20148, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan SchroederDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty for Psychology and Human Movement Science, Institute for Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, 20148, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias SchmidtOsteopathie Schule Deutschland (OSD), Mexikoring 19, 22297, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTensiomyography™ (TMG) and MyotonPRO

methodsTwenty-four subjects (13 female and 11 male, mean ± SD, 38.0 ± 12.0 years) were measured using TMG and MMT over 2 consecutive days. Absolute and relative reliability was calculated by standard error of measurement (SEM, SEM%), Minimum detectable change (MDC, MDC%), coefficient of variation (CV%) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 3.1) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsThe ICCs for all variables and test-retest intervals ranged from 0.75 to 0.99 indicating a good to excellent relative reliability for both TMG and MMT, demonstrating the lowest values for TMG T

conclusionThe reliability for TMG V

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAdultBack MusclesBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedMyographyReproducibility of ResultsMechanomyographyMuscle contractionParaspinal musclesRepeatability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.