ArticleClinical rheumatology2018
Late restoration of renal function in patients with severe ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis who were dialysis-dependent at presentation.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Renal ANCA Vasculitis: A Summary of the Consensus Document of the Catalan Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOMCAT).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Pathological severity determines the renal recovery for anti-myeloperoxidase antibody-associated vasculitis requiring dialysis at disease onset: a retrospective study.BMC nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), many patients with severe renal dysfunction are on dialysis at presentation. Among those who got rid of dialysis finally, renal restoration happened mostly within the first 3 months of treatment. However, in clinical practice, we occasionally encountered patients who got rid of dialysis after 3 months. The current study investigated clinical and pathological features of AAV patients with so-called delayed renal function restoration. A total of 156 patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis who were on dialysis at presentation were retrospectively recruited. Clinical and pathological data as well as treatment and outcomes were analyzed. Among these 156 patients, 58 and 12 patients got rid of dialysis within and after 3 months, respectively. Among the 12 patients with delayed renal function restoration, 8 and 4 patients got rid of dialysis within and after 6 months, respectively. Among the 72 patients who were still on dialysis at the end of 3 months since the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, those receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy over 3 months had significantly higher proportion of renal function restoration than those receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide for only 3 months (8/14 versus 4/58, P < 0.001). For patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis who were on dialysis at presentation, there is an unnegligible proportion of patients who had their renal function restoration beyond 3 months since the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Further studies are needed to investigate whether, and for whom, cyclophosphamide prescription should be prolonged for more than 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.