ArticleSkeletal radiology2018
T2-mapping of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 Tesla: a feasibility and reproducibility study.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sarcopenia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an imaging review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Value of T2 Mapping in Sacroiliitis Associated with Spondyloarthropathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- T2* cartilage mapping in early axial spondyloarthritis: diagnostic accuracy and correlation with clinical characteristics, sacroiliitis MRI scorings, and diffusion metrics.European radiology · 2025Article
- Quantitative and Compositional MRI of the Articular Cartilage: A Narrative Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Sarcopenia: imaging assessment and clinical application.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
- T2 mapping for knee cartilage degeneration in young patients with mild symptoms.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Quantitative T2 mapping of the sacroiliac joint cartilage at 3T in patients with axial spondyloarthropathies.European radiology · 2022Article
- Feasibility of T2 Mapping of the Sacroiliac Joints in Healthy Control Subjects and Children and Young Adults with Sacroiliitis.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- Exercise-induced muscle damage: multi-parametric MRI quantitative assessment.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of the diagnostic values of T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging for sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis.Skeletal radiology · 2020Article
- Image-based biomechanical models of the musculoskeletal system.European radiology experimental · 2020Review
- Imaging of sarcopenia: old evidence and new insights.European radiology · 2020Review
- T2 mapping of the trapeziometacarpal joint and triangular fibrocartilage complex: a feasibility and reproducibility study at 1.5 T.La Radiologia medica · 2020Article
- Patient respiratory-triggered quantitative TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND
methodsHealthy volunteers underwent an oblique axial multislice multiecho spin-echo sequence of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 T. Regions of interest were manually drawn using a dedicated software by two musculoskeletal radiologists to include the cartilaginous part of the sacroiliac joints. A senior radiologist performed the measurement twice, while a resident measured once. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was tested using the Bland-Altman method. Association between sex and T2 relaxation times was tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation between T2 relaxation times and body mass index (BMI) was tested using the Spearman's rho.
resultsEighty sacroiliac joints of 40 subjects (mean age: 28 ± 4.8 years, range: 20-43; mean BMI: 23.3 ± 3.1, range: 18.9-30) were imaged. The mean T2 values obtained by the senior radiologist in the first series of measurements were 42 ± 4.4 ms, whereas in the second series were 40.7 ± 4.5 ms. The mean T2 values obtained by the radiology resident were 41.1 ± 4.2 ms. Intra-observer reproducibility was 88% (coefficient of repeatability = 3.8; bias = 1.28; p < .001), while inter-observer reproducibility was 86% (4.7; -.88; p < .001). There was significant association between sex and T2 relaxation times (p = .024) and significant inverse correlation between T2 relaxation times and BMI (r = -.340, p = .002).
conclusionThe assessment of T2 relaxation time measurements of sacroiliac joints seems to be highly reproducible at 1.5 T. Further studies could investigate the potential clinical application of this tool in the sacroiliac joints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29679101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.