Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29679101›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2018

T2-mapping of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 Tesla: a feasibility and reproducibility study.

Domenico Albano, Vito Chianca, Renato Cuocolo, Rodolfo Bignone, Francesco Ciccia, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Massimo Midiri, Arturo Brunetti, Roberto Lagalla, Massimo Galia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sarcopenia: imaging assessment and clinical application.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Patient respiratory-triggered quantitative TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Domenico AlbanoDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy. albanodomenico@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-9861
Vito ChiancaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Rodolfo BignoneDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco CicciaDepartment of Rheumatology, Di.Bi.Mis, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaUnit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Massimo MidiriDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Arturo BrunettiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberto LagallaDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GaliaDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND

methodsHealthy volunteers underwent an oblique axial multislice multiecho spin-echo sequence of the sacroiliac joints at 1.5 T. Regions of interest were manually drawn using a dedicated software by two musculoskeletal radiologists to include the cartilaginous part of the sacroiliac joints. A senior radiologist performed the measurement twice, while a resident measured once. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was tested using the Bland-Altman method. Association between sex and T2 relaxation times was tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation between T2 relaxation times and body mass index (BMI) was tested using the Spearman's rho.

resultsEighty sacroiliac joints of 40 subjects (mean age: 28 ± 4.8 years, range: 20-43; mean BMI: 23.3 ± 3.1, range: 18.9-30) were imaged. The mean T2 values obtained by the senior radiologist in the first series of measurements were 42 ± 4.4 ms, whereas in the second series were 40.7 ± 4.5 ms. The mean T2 values obtained by the radiology resident were 41.1 ± 4.2 ms. Intra-observer reproducibility was 88% (coefficient of repeatability = 3.8; bias = 1.28; p < .001), while inter-observer reproducibility was 86% (4.7; -.88; p < .001). There was significant association between sex and T2 relaxation times (p = .024) and significant inverse correlation between T2 relaxation times and BMI (r = -.340, p = .002).

conclusionThe assessment of T2 relaxation time measurements of sacroiliac joints seems to be highly reproducible at 1.5 T. Further studies could investigate the potential clinical application of this tool in the sacroiliac joints.

Indexed as

AdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsSacroiliac JointCartilageMagnetic resonance imagingSacroiliac jointT2 mapping

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.