Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29679099›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Radiation-induced carotid artery lesions.

Verónica Fernández-Alvarez, Fernando López, Carlos Suárez, Primoz Strojan, Avraham Eisbruch, Carl E Silver, William M Mendenhall, Johannes A Langendijk, Alessandra Rinaldo, Anne W M Lee and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiation Vasculopathy.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2025
    Review
  7. Risk factors of post-irradiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Radiation-induced oral mucositis presenting as atypical vascular proliferation: a case report.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Verónica Fernández-AlvarezDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Fernando LópezDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-9746
Carlos SuárezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain. csuareznieto@gmail.com.
Primoz StrojanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Avraham EisbruchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carl E SilverDepartment of Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
William M MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Johannes A LangendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alessandra RinaldoUniversity of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.
Anne W M LeeCenter of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jonathan J BeitlerDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Otolaryngology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert SmeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Javier AlvarezDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Alfio FerlitoInternational Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.
Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes · ESEmory University · USInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESPrince of Wales Hospital · AUUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CNUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the current aspects of knowledge related to the risk of cerebrovascular events in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed. Papers meeting selection criteria were reviewed.

resultsWe provide an update on the problem by identifying key studies that have contributed to our current understanding of the epidemiology, radiologic features, pathogenesis, and treatment of the disease. The incidence of carotid artery stenosis ranged from 18 to 38% in patients who underwent radiotherapy for head and neck cancer versus from 0 to 9.2% among the nonirradiated patients. Neck irradiation increases the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery wall. These changes are the earliest visible alteration in the carotid wall and are also detected with color Doppler ultrasonography. Endovascular treatment with a carotid angioplasty and stenting is the first-line treatment for most symptomatic patients.

conclusionsRadiation-induced atherosclerosis is a different and accelerated form of atherosclerosis, which implies a more aggressive disease with a different biologic behavior. The disease is characterized by a high rate of carotid artery stenosis compared to those observed in nonirradiated control group patients. To prevent the risk of stroke, surveillance and imaging with ultrasonography should enable detection of severe stenosis. Endovascular treatment with a carotid angioplasty and stenting has been proposed as an attractive and minimally invasive alternative for some radiation-induced stenoses.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonCarotid ArteriesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessCarotid StenosisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOtorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesStentsUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorAtherosclerosisCarotid stenosisEndarterectomy, carotidHead and neck neoplasmsRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29679099
OpenAlexW2801057116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.