Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29678995›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Intermittent versus continuous oxygen saturation monitoring for infants hospitalised with bronchiolitis: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Sanjay Mahant, Gita Wahi, Lucy Giglia, Catherine Pound, Ronik Kanani, Ann Bayliss, Madan Roy, Mahmoud Sakran, Natascha Kozlowski, Karen Breen-Reid and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02947204 (Intermittent vs. Continuous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Infants Hospitalized for Bronchiolitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02947204 nacompletednot on this map

Intermittent vs. Continuous Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Infants Hospitalized for Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2016 to 2019Enrolled219ConditionsBronchiolitisArmsIntermittent oxygen monitoring, Continuous oxygen monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjay MahantDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Paediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT), Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gita WahiDepartment of Pediatrics, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lucy GigliaDepartment of Pediatrics, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine PoundDepartment of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ronik KananiDepartment of Paediatrics, North York General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann BaylissTrillium Health Partners, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Madan RoyDepartment of Pediatrics, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mahmoud SakranDepartment of Paediatrics, Queens University, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Natascha KozlowskiResearch, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
Karen Breen-ReidInterprofessional Education, Learning Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mollie LavigneLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laila PremjiDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Myla E MorettiClinical Trials Unit-Ontario Child Health Support Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew R WillanDalla Lana School of Public Health, Ontario Child Health Support Unit, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suzanne SchuhDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia C ParkinDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Paediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT), Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CALakeridge Health · CAMcMaster University · CANorth York General Hospital · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBronchiolitis is the most common reason for hospitalisation in infants in developed countries. The main focus of hospital care is on supportive care, such as monitoring for hypoxia and supplemental oxygen administration, as active therapies lack effectiveness. Pulse oximetry is used to monitor hypoxia in hospitalised infants and is used either intermittently or continuously. Observational studies have suggested that continuous pulse oximetry use leads to a longer length of hospital stay in stable infants. The use of continuous pulse oximetry may lead to unnecessary clinical intervention due to readings that are of little clinical significance, false-positive readings and less reliance on the clinical status. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide which pulse oximetry monitoring strategy, intermittent or continuous, is superior in infants hospitalised with bronchiolitis with respect to patient and policy-relevant outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing two strategies for pulse oximetry monitoring in infants hospitalised for bronchiolitis. Infants aged 1 month to 2 years presenting to Canadian tertiary and community hospitals will be randomised after stabilisation to receive either intermittent or continuous oxygen saturation monitoring on the inpatient unit until discharge. The primary outcome is length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of effectiveness, acceptability, safety and cost. We will need to enrol 210 infants in order to detect a 12-hour difference in length of stay with a type 1 error rate of 5% and a power of 90%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been obtained for this trial. This trial will provide data to guide hospitals and clinicians on the optimal pulse oximetry monitoring strategy in infants hospitalised with bronchiolitis. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publication, professional societies and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02947204.

Indexed as

OximetryBronchiolitisChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsHumansInfantLength of StayMonitoring, PhysiologicOxygenPilot ProjectsResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeOxygenbronchiolitispulse oximetryrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29678995
PMCPMC5914772
OpenAlexW2801750022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.