Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29678989›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Prescribing and deprescribing antihypertensive medication in older people by Dutch general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Tessa van Middelaar, Sophie D Ivens, Petra G van Peet, Rosalinde K E Poortvliet, Edo Richard, A Jeannette Pols, Eric P Moll van Charante

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Across the Spectrum of Frailty.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. GPs' mindlines on deprescribing antihypertensives in older patients with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in English general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tessa van MiddelaarDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sophie D IvensDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra G van PeetDepartment of General Practice, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rosalinde K E PoortvlietDepartment of General Practice, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Edo RichardDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A Jeannette PolsDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric P Moll van CharanteDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore general practitioners' (GPs) routines and considerations on (de)prescribing antihypertensive medication (AHM) in older patients, their judgement on usability of the current guideline and needs for future support.

designSemistructured interviews.

settingDutch general practice.

participantsFifteen GPs were purposively sampled based on level of experience and practice characteristics until saturation was reached.

resultsGPs appeared reluctant to start AHM, especially in patient >80 years. High systolic blood pressure and history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes were enablers to start or intensify treatment. Reasons to refrain from this were frailty and patient preference. GPs described a tendency to continue AHM regimens unchanged, influenced by daily time constraints, automated prescription routines and anticipating discomfort when disturbing patients' delicate balance. GPs were only inclined to deprescribe AHM in terminally ill patients or after prolonged achievement of target levels in combination with side effects or patient preference. Deprescription was facilitated when GPs had experience with patients showing increased quality of life after deprescription and was withheld by anticipated regret (ie, GPs' fear of a stroke after deprescribing). GPs felt insufficient guidance from current guidelines, especially on deprescription.

conclusionsGPs are reluctant to start or deprescribe AHM in older people and have a propensity to continue AHM within a daily routine that insufficiently supports critical medication review. (De)prescription is influenced by patient preferences and anticipated regret and current guidelines provide insufficient guidance.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAntihypertensive AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareFemaleGeneral PracticeGuideline AdherenceHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient PreferenceAntihypertensive Agentsantihypertensive agentsblood pressuredeprescriptionsdrug prescriptionsgeneral practicequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID29678989
PMCPMC5914897
OpenAlexW2800323842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.