ArticleBMC public health2018
Popularity and impact of using smart devices in medicine: experiences in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of educational interventions for improving healthcare professionals' information literacy: A systematic review.Health information and libraries journal · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing Primary Care Physicians' Readiness for AI-Based Adaptive Learning: Perceptions, Barriers, and Learning Needs in Northern Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Usability and Quality of a Clinical Mobile App for Assisting Physicians in Head Computed Tomography Scan Ordering: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Identifying primary care clinicians' preferences for, barriers to, and facilitators of information-seeking in clinical practice in Singapore: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The use and perceived value of electronic health information resources by health care professionals in the field of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing in Jazan province, Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- A novel smartphone application for bladder cancer management (BCM App): Design, development, and usability evaluation.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Article
- The Usage of Digital Health Mobile-Based Applications among Saudi Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of clinical-guideline-based mobile application and its effect on head CT scan utilization in neurology and neurosurgery departments.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Convergent Validity of an Activity Tracker for Low Back Pain Within a Clinical Study: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2021Article
- What is the impact of Apps in medical education? A study of CAPSULE, a case-based learning App.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Care Staff Perspectives on Using Mobile Technology to Support Communication in Long-Term Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR nursing · 2020Article
- Smartphone and medical application use among dentists in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- "Webside" healthcare from medical interns' perspective: Telemedicine implementation and need for training.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
- Smart Devices and Better Health: Positive Associations Between Smart Devices and Health Among Older Adults.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to investigate smart device medical apps currently preferred by physicians in Saudi Arabia and the perceived impact of the apps on patient care.
methodsQuestionnaires for this cross-sectional study on smart device medical apps were randomly emailed to 384 physicians registered in the Saudi Commission of Health Specialists database. A total of 300 physicians returned completed questionnaires, with a response rate of 78.5%. Physician demographics and their perceptions of medical apps were assessed, including questions on the purpose, impact, and types of medical apps used. Questions were answered using a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = not sure, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree).
resultsStudy subjects had a median age of 39 years (57.7% male). Most respondents (88.3%) had smart devices, and 86.3% had at least one medical app installed. Just over half used an app at least once a day (53.0%). Medical apps were positively perceived, with physicians reporting increased dependency on the apps (Likert score: 4.7 ± 0.5).
conclusionMedical apps were perceived to positively impact education, physician efficiency, and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.