ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
ClustAGE: a tool for clustering and distribution analysis of bacterial accessory genomic elements.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative genome analysis of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa: gene diversity, clonal distribution, and genome dynamics.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Unveiling the genomic secrets ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Pan-Mitogenome Construction, Intraspecific Variation, and Adaptive Evolution of the Plant Pathogenic FungusBiology · 2025Article
- A glyoxal-specific aldehyde signaling axis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that influences quorum sensing and infection.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genetic and virulence factors behind the success of high-riskFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling a novel exopolysaccharide produced by Pseudomonas alcaligenes Med1 isolated from a Chilean hot spring as biotechnological additive.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Case report of disseminated borrelial lymphocytoma with isolation ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Delving into the lifestyle of Sundarban Wetland resident, biofilm producing, halotolerant Salinicoccus roseus: a comparative genomics-based intervention.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- l-Asparaginase producing novel3 Biotech · 2023Article
- In Silico and In Vitro Analyses Reveal Promising Antimicrobial Peptides from Myxobacteria.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2023Article
- Carbapenemase genes distribution in clonal lineages ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative Genomics and Physiological Characterization of Two Aerobic Spore Formers Isolated from Human Ileal Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Intra-Species Genomic Variation in the Pine PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Differences in the Accessory Genomes and Methylomes of Strains of Streptococcus equi subsp.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Review
- Genomic Features Associated with the Degree of Phenotypic Resistance to Carbapenems in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.mSystems · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe non-conserved accessory genome of bacteria can be associated with important adaptive characteristics that can contribute to niche specificity or pathogenicity of strains. High degrees of structural and compositional diversity in genomic islands and other elements of the accessory genome can complicate characterization of accessory genome contents among populations of strains. Methods for easily and effectively defining the distributions of discrete elements of the accessory genome among bacterial strains in a population are needed to explore the relationships between the flexible genome and bacterial adaptive traits.
resultsWe have developed the open-source software package ClustAGE. This program, written in Perl, uses BLAST to cluster nucleotide accessory genomic elements from the genomes of multiple bacterial strains and to identify their distribution within the study population. The program output can be used in combination with strain phenotype data or other characteristics to detect associations. Optional graphical output is available for visualizing accessory genome gene content and distribution patterns. The capabilities of the software are demonstrated on a collection of 14 Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome sequences.
conclusionsThe ClustAGE software and utilities are effective for identifying characteristics and distributions of accessory genomic elements among groups of bacterial genomes. The ability to easily and effectively characterize the accessory genome of a sequence collection may provide a better understanding of the accessory genome's contribution to a species' adaptation and pathogenesis. The ClustAGE source code can be downloaded from https://clustage.sourceforge.io and a limited web-based implementation is available at http://vfsmspineagent.fsm.northwestern.edu/cgi-bin/clustage.cgi .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.