Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677689›Full record

Trial reportClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.

Hanin Karawani, Kimberly A Jenkins, Samira Anderson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Are Current Data Sufficient to Infer that Hearing Aids Contribute to Postural Control and Balance in Older Adults? A Systematic Review.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanin KarawaniDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. Electronic address: karawani@umd.edu.
Kimberly A JenkinsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Age-related changes in neural encoding and perception of temporal speech cuesR21DC015843 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ANDERSON, SAMIRA B · 2016 to 2018
$436k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividuals with age-related hearing loss (ARHL) can restore some loss of the auditory function with the use of hearing aids (HAs). However, what remains unknown are the physiological mechanisms that underlie how the brain changes with exposure to amplified sounds though the use of HAs. We aimed to examine behavioral and physiological changes induced by HAs.

methodsThirty-five older-adults with moderate ARHL with no history of hearing aid use were fit with HAs tested in aided and unaided conditions, and divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group used HAs during a period of six months. The control group did not use HAs during this period, but were given the opportunity to use them after the completion of the study. Both groups underwent testing protocols six months apart. Outcome measures included behavioral (speech-in-noise measures, self-assessment questionnaires) and electrophysiological brainstem recordings (frequency-following responses) to the speech syllable /ga/ in two quiet conditions and in six-talker babble noise.

resultsThe experimental group reported subjective benefits on self-assessment questionnaires. Significant physiological changes were observed in the experimental group, specifically a reduction in fundamental frequency magnitude, while no change was observed in controls, yielding a significant time × group interaction. Furthermore, peak latencies remained stable in the experimental group but were significantly delayed in the control group after six months. Significant correlations between behavioral and physiological changes were also observed.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that HAs may alter subcortical processing and offset neural timing delay; however, further investigation is needed to understand cortical changes and HA effects on cognitive processing. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of the current study provide evidence for clinicians that the use of HAs may prevent further loss of auditory function resulting from sensory deprivation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAuditory ThresholdFemaleHearingHearing AidsHearing LossHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech PerceptionAge-related hearing lossAmplificationFrequency-following responseHearing aidsHearing lossOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID29677689
PMCPMC5938109
OpenAlexW2795688051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.