ArticleMutation research2018
Effective discovery of rare variants by pooled target capture sequencing: A comparative analysis with individually indexed target capture sequencing.
Article in Mutation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population genetic variation characterised through serial independent pool-seq: the Cyprus Genome Project.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DoBSeqWF: a framework for sensitive detection of individual genetic variation in pooled sequencing data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Targeted sequencing of the 9p21.3 region reveals association with reduced disease risks in Ashkenazi Jewish centenarians.Aging cell · 2023Article
- High-throughput sequencing analysis of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes reveals a genetic signature of human longevity.GeroScience · 2023Article
- A rare human centenarian variant of SIRT6 enhances genome stability and interaction with Lamin A.The EMBO journal · 2022Article
- Interest of exome sequencing trio-like strategy based on pooled parental DNA for diagnosis and translational research in rare diseases.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Benchmarking the performance of Pool-seq SNP callers using simulated and real sequencing data.Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of all genetic variants associated with complex traits is one of the most important goals in modern human genetics. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successfully applied to identify common variants, which thus far explain only small portion of heritability. Interests in rare variants have been increasingly growing as an answer for this missing heritability. While next-generation sequencing allows detection of rare variants, its cost is still prohibitively high to sequence a large number of human DNA samples required for rare variant association studies. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of sequencing for pooled DNA samples of multiple individuals (Pool-seq) as a cost-effective and robust approach for rare variant discovery. We comparatively analyzed Pool-seq vs. individual-seq of indexed target capture of up to 960 genes in ∼1000 individuals, followed by independent genotyping validation studies. We found that Pool-seq was as effective and accurate as individual-seq in detecting rare variants and accurately estimating their minor allele frequencies (MAFs). Our results suggest that Pool-seq can be used as an efficient and cost-effective method for discovery of rare variants for population-based sequencing studies in individual laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.