Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677324›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2018

Endogenous attention improves perception in amblyopic macaques.

Amelie Pham, Marisa Carrasco, Lynne Kiorpes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attention deficits in Amblyopia.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amelie PhamCenter for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Marisa CarrascoCenter for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Lynne KiorpesCenter for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

YILMA SIV VACCINIA VACCINE TRIALP51RR000166 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HU, SHIU-LOK · 1985 to 2011
$161.1M
Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL FUNCTIONR01EY005864 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIORPES, LYNNE · 1988 to 2023
$9.2M
Temporal Dynamics of Visual Perception and AttentionR01EY019693 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2010 to 2022
$4.0M
Effects of covert attention on early visionR01EY016200 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2006 to 2013
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000166NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005864NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016200NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amblyopia, a developmental disorder of vision, affects many aspects of spatial vision as well as motion perception and some cognitive skills. Current models of amblyopic vision based on known neurophysiological deficiencies have yet to provide an understanding of the wide range of amblyopic perceptual losses. Visual spatial attention is known to enhance performance in a variety of detection and discrimination tasks in visually typical humans and nonhuman primates. We investigated whether and how voluntary spatial attention affected psychophysical performance in amblyopic macaques. Full-contrast response functions for motion direction discrimination were measured for each eye of six monkeys: five amblyopic and one control. We assessed whether the effect of a valid spatial cue on performance corresponded to a change in contrast gain, a leftward shift of the function, or response gain, an upward scaling of the function. Our results showed that macaque amblyopes benefit from a valid spatial cue. Performance with amblyopic eyes viewing showed enhancement of both contrast and response gain whereas fellow and control eyes' performance showed only contrast gain. Reaction time analysis showed no speed accuracy trade-off in any case. The valid spatial cue improved contrast sensitivity for the amblyopic eye, effectively eliminating the amblyopic contrast sensitivity deficit. These results suggest that engaging endogenous spatial attention may confer substantial benefit to amblyopic vision.

Indexed as

AttentionAmblyopiaAnimalsContrast SensitivityCuesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMacaca nemestrinaMalePsychophysicsSpatial ProcessingVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID29677324
PMCPMC5868757
OpenAlexW2793582645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.