Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677302›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Eric Jelovsek, Matthew D Barber, Linda Brubaker, Peggy Norton, Marie Gantz, Holly E Richter, Alison Weidner, Shawn Menefee, Joseph Schaffer, Norma Pugh and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01166373 nacompletednot on this map

Long-Term Effectiveness Of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligament Suspension With and Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training: Extended Operations & Pelvic Muscle Training Of Apical Support Loss Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkRan2010 to 2016Enrolled285ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsEnrollment video, SSLF, ULS, PMT, Usual Care
NCT05688059 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Is Absorbable Suture Non-Inferior to Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension? A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlantic Health SystemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled49ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Uterovaginal Prolapse, Vaginal Vault Prolapse, CystoceleArmsAbsorbable Suture and Permanent Suture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

J Eric JelovsekObstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Matthew D BarberObstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Linda BrubakerDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Peggy NortonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Medical Center, Salt Lake City.
Marie GantzRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Holly E RichterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Alison WeidnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Shawn MenefeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Kaiser Permanente, San Diego.
Joseph SchafferDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Norma PughRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Susan MeikleNorthwest Physician Group, Amarillo, Texas.
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Cleveland Clinic · USRTI International · USDuke Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · USLoyola University Chicago · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Pelvic floor Disorders Network-Data Coordinating CenterU01HD041249 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEI, JOHN T · 2001 to 2010
$19.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)U01HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GANTZ, MARIE G · 2011 to 2015
$19.7M
Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialU10HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
The Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD041250 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2015
$3.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
The Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteU10HD054215 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARBER, MATTHEW D · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHAFFER, JOSEPH I · 2006 to 2015
$1.9M
UTAH PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERS NETWORKU10HD054136 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2006 to 2015
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD041249NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041250NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054136NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) are commonly performed pelvic organ prolapse procedures despite a lack of long-term efficacy data. Objective: To compare outcomes in women randomized to (1) ULS or SSLF and (2) usual care or perioperative behavioral therapy and pelvic floor muscle training (BPMT) for vaginal apical prolapse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 US medical centers. Eligible participants who completed the Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss Trial enrolled between January 2008 and March 2011 and were followed up 5 years after their index surgery from April 2011 through June 2016. Interventions: Two randomizations: (1) BPMT (n = 186) or usual care (n = 188) and (2) surgical intervention (ULS: n = 188 or SSLF: n = 186). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary surgical outcome was time to surgical failure. Surgical failure was defined as (1) apical descent greater than one-third of total vaginal length or anterior or posterior vaginal wall beyond the hymen or retreatment for prolapse (anatomic failure), or (2) bothersome bulge symptoms. The primary behavioral outcomes were time to anatomic failure and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores (range, 0-300). Results: The original study randomized 374 patients, of whom 309 were eligible for this extended trial. For this study, 285 enrolled (mean age, 57.2 years), of whom 244 (86%) completed the extended trial. By year 5, the estimated surgical failure rate was 61.5% in the ULS group and 70.3% in the SSLF group (adjusted difference, -8.8% [95% CI, -24.2 to 6.6]). The estimated anatomic failure rate was 45.6% in the BPMT group and 47.2% in the usual care group (adjusted difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -21.2 to 17.9]). Improvements in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores were -59.4 in the BPMT group and -61.8 in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference, 2.4 [95% CI, -13.7 to 18.4]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among women who had undergone vaginal surgery for apical pelvic organ vaginal prolapse, there was no significant difference between ULS and SSLF in rates of surgical failure and no significant difference between perioperative behavioral muscle training and usual care on rates of anatomic success and symptom scores at 5 years. Compared with outcomes at 2 years, rates of surgical failure increased during the follow-up period, although prolapse symptom scores remained improved. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01166373.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLigamentsMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSuburethral SlingsTreatment FailureUrinary Incontinence, StressUterine Prolapse

Identifiers

PMID29677302
PMCPMC5933329
OpenAlexW2799855555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.