Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Empirical mode decomposition processing to improve multifocal-visual-evoked-potential signal analysis in multiple sclerosis.

Luis de Santiago, Eva Sánchez-Morla, Román Blanco, Juan Manuel Miguel, Carlos Amo, Miguel Ortiz Del Castillo, Almudena López, Luciano Boquete

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis de SantiagoDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Eva Sánchez-MorlaInstituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain.
Román BlancoDepartamento de Cirugía, Ciencias Médicas y Sociales, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel MiguelDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos AmoDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ortiz Del CastilloDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena LópezDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Luciano BoqueteDepartamento de Electrónica, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-6103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the performance of multifocal-visual-evoked-potential (mfVEP) signals filtered using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) in discriminating, based on amplitude, between control and multiple sclerosis (MS) patient groups, and to reduce variability in interocular latency in control subjects.

methodsMfVEP signals were obtained from controls, clinically definitive MS and MS-risk progression patients (radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)). The conventional method of processing mfVEPs consists of using a 1-35 Hz bandpass frequency filter (XDFT). The EMD algorithm was used to decompose the XDFT signals into several intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). This signal processing was assessed by computing the amplitudes and latencies of the XDFT and IMF signals (XEMD). The amplitudes from the full visual field and from ring 5 (9.8-15° eccentricity) were studied. The discrimination index was calculated between controls and patients. Interocular latency values were computed from the XDFT and XEMD signals in a control database to study variability.

resultsUsing the amplitude of the mfVEP signals filtered with EMD (XEMD) obtains higher discrimination index values than the conventional method when control, MS-risk progression (RIS and CIS) and MS subjects are studied. The lowest variability in interocular latency computations from the control patient database was obtained by comparing the XEMD signals with the XDFT signals. Even better results (amplitude discrimination and latency variability) were obtained in ring 5 (9.8-15° eccentricity of the visual field).

conclusionsFiltering mfVEP signals using the EMD algorithm will result in better identification of subjects at risk of developing MS and better accuracy in latency studies. This could be applied to assess visual cortex activity in MS diagnosis and evolution studies.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisOptic NeuritisVisual FieldsVisual PathwaysYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29677200
PMCPMC5909914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.