Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677197›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

A novel statistical method for assessing effective adherence to medication and calculating optimal drug dosages.

Garrett Greene, Richard W Costello, Breda Cushen, Imran Sulaiman, Elaine Mac Hale, Ronan M Conroy, Frank Doyle

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mobile Health for Asthma.CHEST pulmonary · 2023
    Review
  3. Assessing adherence to inhaled therapies in asthma and the emergence of electronic monitoring devices.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  4. The Inhaler Technique Questionnaire (InTeQ): Development and Validation of a Brief Patient-Reported Measure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Garrett GreeneDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8531-3142
Richard W CostelloClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Breda CushenClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Imran SulaimanClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Elaine Mac HaleClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ronan M ConroyDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Frank DoyleDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe derive a novel model-based metric for effective adherence to medication, and validate it using data from the INhaler Compliance Assessment device (INCATM). This technique employs dose timing data to estimate the threshold drug concentration needed to maintain optimal health.

methodsThe parameters of the model are optimised against patient outcome data using maximum likelihood methods. The model is fitted and validated by secondary analysis of two independent datasets from two remote-monitoring studies of adherence, conducted through clinical research centres of 5 Irish hospitals. Training data came from a cohort of asthma patients (~ 47,000 samples from 218 patients). Validation data is from a cohort of 204 patients with COPD recorded between 2014 and 2016.

resultsThe time above threshold measure is strongly predictive of adverse events (exacerbations) in COPD patients (Odds Ratio of exacerbation = 0.52 per SD increase in adherence, 95% Confidence Interval [0.34-0.79]). This compares well with the best known previous method, the Area Under the dose-time Curve (AUC) (Odds Ratio = 0.69, 95% Confidence Interval [0.48-0.99]). In addition, the fitted value of the dose threshold (0.56 of prescribed dosage) suggests that prescribed doses may be unnecessarily high given good adherence.

conclusionsThe resulting metric accounts for missed doses, dose-timing errors, and errors in inhaler technique, and provides enhanced predictive validity in comparison to previously used measures. In addition, the method allows us to estimate the correct dosage required to achieve the effect of the medication using the patients' own adherence data and outcomes. The adherence score does depend not on sex or other demographic factors suggesting that effective adherence is driven by individual behavioural factors.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsMedication AdherenceModels, StatisticalAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsArea Under CurveAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf ReportAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID29677197
PMCPMC5909911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.