Trial reportPLoS medicine2018
Breastfeeding during infancy and neurocognitive function in adolescence: 16-year follow-up of the PROBIT cluster-randomized trial.
Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01561612 (Breastfeeding Promotion RCT and Child Metabolic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Breastfeeding Promotion RCT and Child Metabolic Syndrome
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationships between optimal infant feeding practices and child development and attained height at age 2 years and 6-7 years.Maternal & child nutrition · 2024Trial
- Breastfeeding Duration and Cognitive Performance Among Youths.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Nutrition in early life interacts with genetic risk to influence preadult behaviour in the Raine Study.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Causal effects of breastfeeding promotion on child health: understanding the role of nutrition.Swiss journal of economics and statistics · 2026Article
- Breastfeeding, genetic susceptibility, and type 2 diabetes in offspring in later life.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Differences in Neurocognitive Development Between Children Who Had Had No Breast Milk and Those Who Had Had Breast Milk for at Least 6 Months.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Computerized Cognitive Test Batteries for Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Tools For Lab- and Web-Based Settings From 2000 to 2021.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023Article
- A Taxonomy of Non-honesty in Public Health Communication.Public health ethics · 2023Article
- Infancy Dietary Patterns, Development, and Health: An Extensive Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Regression to the mean in latent change score models: an example involving breastfeeding and intelligence.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Infant Formula Supplemented With Milk Fat Globule Membrane, Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, and Synbiotics Is Associated With Neurocognitive Function and Brain Structure of Healthy Children Aged 6 Years: The COGNIS Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Article
- Breast feeding and infant development in a cohort with sibling pair analysis: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Analysis of Maternal Prenatal Weight and Offspring Cognition and Behavior: Results From the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Cohort.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Early childhood growth trajectory and later cognitive ability: evidence from a large prospective birth cohort of healthy term-born children.International journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Associations between Civic Engagement and Community College Completion in a Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults.Community college journal of research and practice · 2021Article
- Article
- Do Human Milk Oligosaccharides Protect Against Infant Atopic Disorders and Food Allergy?Nutrients · 2020Article
- Maternal Programming of Social Dominance via Milk Cytokines.iScience · 2020Article
- Maternal religion and breastfeeding intention and practice in the US Project Viva cohort.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on the long-term effect of breastfeeding on neurocognitive development is based almost exclusively on observational studies. In the 16-year follow-up study of a large, cluster-randomized trial of a breastfeeding promotion intervention, we evaluated the long-term persistence of the neurocognitive benefits of the breastfeeding promotion intervention previously observed at early school age. METHODS AND
findingsA total of 13,557 participants (79.5% of the 17,046 randomized) of the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) were followed up at age 16 from September 2012 to July 2015. At the follow-up, neurocognitive function was assessed in 7 verbal and nonverbal cognitive domains using a computerized, self-administered test battery among 13,427 participants. Using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis as our prespecified primary analysis, we estimated cluster- and baseline characteristic-adjusted mean differences between the intervention (prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding promotion modelled on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative) and control (usual care) groups in 7 cognitive domains and a global cognitive score. In our prespecified secondary analysis, we estimated mean differences by instrumental variable (IV) analysis to account for noncompliance with the randomly assigned intervention and estimate causal effects of breastfeeding. The 16-year follow-up rates were similar in the intervention (79.7%) and control groups (79.3%), and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two. In the cluster-adjusted ITT analyses, children in the intervention group did not show statistically significant differences in the scores from children in the control group. Prespecified additional adjustment for baseline characteristics improved statistical precision and resulted in slightly higher scores among children in the intervention for verbal function (1.4 [95% CI 0.3-2.5]) and memory (1.2 [95% CI 0.01-2.4]). IV analysis showed that children who were exclusively breastfed for ≥3 (versus <3) months had a 3.5-point (95% CI 0.9-6.1) higher verbal function, but no differences were observed in other domains. While our computerized, self-administered cognitive testing reduced the cluster-level variability in the scores, it may have increased individual-level measurement errors in adolescents.
conclusionsWe observed no benefit of a breastfeeding promotion intervention on overall neurocognitive function. The only beneficial effect was on verbal function at age 16. The higher verbal ability is consistent with results observed at early school age; however, the effect size was substantially smaller in adolescence. PROBIT
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01561612.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.