Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677185›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Patterning mechanisms diversify neuroepithelial domains in the Drosophila optic placode.

Abhishek Kumar Mishra, F Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Cornelia Fritsch, Tim-Henning Humberg, Boris Egger, Simon G Sprecher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein ensembles link genotype to phenotype.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhishek Kumar MishraDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
F Javier Bernardo-GarciaDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8945-4919
Cornelia FritschDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Tim-Henning HumbergDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-2453
Boris EggerDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Simon G SprecherDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-3750
University of Fribourg · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system develops from monolayered neuroepithelial sheets. In a first step patterning mechanisms subdivide the seemingly uniform epithelia into domains allowing an increase of neuronal diversity in a tightly controlled spatial and temporal manner. In Drosophila, neuroepithelial patterning of the embryonic optic placode gives rise to the larval eye primordium, consisting of two photoreceptor (PR) precursor types (primary and secondary), as well as the optic lobe primordium, which during larval and pupal stages develops into the prominent optic ganglia. Here, we characterize a genetic network that regulates the balance between larval eye and optic lobe precursors, as well as between primary and secondary PR precursors. In a first step the proneural factor Atonal (Ato) specifies larval eye precursors, while the orphan nuclear receptor Tailless (Tll) is crucial for the specification of optic lobe precursors. The Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways act upstream of Ato and Tll to coordinate neural precursor specification in a timely manner. The correct spatial placement of the boundary between Ato and Tll in turn is required to control the precise number of primary and secondary PR precursors. In a second step, Notch signaling also controls a binary cell fate decision, thus, acts at the top of a cascade of transcription factor interactions to define PR subtype identity. Our model serves as an example of how combinatorial action of cell extrinsic and cell intrinsic factors control neural tissue patterning.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBody PatterningDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEyeGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, InsectHedgehog ProteinsLarvaMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroepithelial CellsOptic Lobe, Nonmammalianato protein, DrosophilaBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHedgehog Proteinshh protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue ProteinsN protein, DrosophilaReceptors, NotchRepressor ProteinsTLL protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID29677185
PMCPMC5937791
OpenAlexW2799981630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.