Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29677129›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Assessment of Dry Epidermal Electrodes for Long-Term Electromyography Measurements.

Momona Yamagami, Keshia M Peters, Ivana Milovanovic, Irene Kuang, Zeyu Yang, Nanshu Lu, Katherine M Steele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A gel-free TiAdvanced materials technologies · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Decoding Intent With Control Theory: Comparing Muscle Versus Manual Interface Performance.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Momona YamagamiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. my13@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3934-9325
Keshia M PetersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. rumbek@uw.edu.
Ivana MilovanovicDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. ivamil@uw.edu.
Irene KuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. ikuang@mit.edu.
Zeyu YangChengdu Rotex Technology Company Ltd., Chengdu 610041, China. zeyu.yang@rotextech.com.
Nanshu LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA. lunanshu@gmail.com.
Katherine M SteeleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. kmsteele@uw.edu.

Funding

SCH: Ubiquitous rehabilitation to improve movement after neurologic injury R01EB021935 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEELE, KATHERINE M · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercially available electrodes can only provide quality surface electromyography (sEMG) measurements for a limited duration due to user discomfort and signal degradation, but in many applications, collecting sEMG data for a full day or longer is desirable to enhance clinical care. Few studies for long-term sEMG have assessed signal quality of electrodes using clinically relevant tests. The goal of this research was to evaluate flexible, gold-based epidermal sensor system (ESS) electrodes for long-term sEMG recordings. We collected sEMG and impedance data from eight subjects from ESS and standard clinical electrodes on upper extremity muscles during maximum voluntary isometric contraction tests, dynamic range of motion tests, the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, and the Box & Block Test. Four additional subjects were recruited to test the stability of ESS signals over four days. Signals from the ESS and traditional electrodes were strongly correlated across tasks. Measures of signal quality, such as signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-motion ratio, were also similar for both electrodes. Over the four-day trial, no significant decrease in signal quality was observed in the ESS electrodes, suggesting that thin, flexible electrodes may provide a robust tool that does not inhibit movement or irritate the skin for long-term measurements of muscle activity in rehabilitation and other applications.

Indexed as

BlockBox &ampimpedance measurementsJebsen Taylor Hand Function Testneurological injurysignal-to-noise ratiostroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29677129
PMCPMC5948629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.