Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29675884›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

Specific breast cancer prognosis-subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns.

Shumei Zhang, Yihan Wang, Yue Gu, Jiang Zhu, Ce Ci, Zhongfu Guo, Chuangeng Chen, Yanjun Wei, Wenhua Lv, Hongbo Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. BRCA1/2 methylation and expression dynamics in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: insights from gene, protein, and TCGA analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Computational prediction of promotors inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shumei ZhangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Yihan WangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Yue GuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Jiang ZhuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Ce CiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Zhongfu GuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China.
Chuangeng ChenCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Yanjun WeiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Wenhua LvCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Hongbo LiuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.
Dongwei ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China.
Yan ZhangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour heterogeneity is an obstacle to effective breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, thus characterizing tumour heterogeneity by epigenetic features can be clinically informative. In this study, we explored specific prognosis-subtypes based on DNA methylation status using 669 breast cancers from the TCGA database. Nine subgroups were distinguished by consensus clustering using 3869 CpGs that significantly influenced survival. The specific DNA methylation patterns were reflected by different races, ages, tumour stages, receptor status, histological types, metastasis status and prognosis. Compared with the PAM50 subtypes, which use gene expression clustering, DNA methylation subtypes were more elaborate and classified the Basal-like subtype into two different prognosis-subgroups. Additionally, 1252 CpGs (corresponding to 888 genes) were identified as specific hyper/hypomethylation sites for each specific subgroup. Finally, a prognosis model based on Bayesian network classification was constructed and used to classify the test set into DNA methylation subgroups, which corresponded to the classification results of the train set. These specific classifications by DNA methylation can explain the heterogeneity of previous molecular subgroups in breast cancer and will help in the development of personalized treatments for the new specific subtypes.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionCpG IslandsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansModels, BiologicalPrognosisROC CurveSurvival Analysisbreast cancerconsensus clusteringDNA methylationmolecular subtypes

Identifiers

PMID29675884
PMCPMC6026876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.