Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29675807›Full record

Trial reportVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018

The prognostic impact of CDX2 correlates with the underlying mismatch repair status and BRAF mutational status but not with distant metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Jens Neumann, Volker Heinemann, Jutta Engel, Thomas Kirchner, Sebastian Stintzing

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Loss ofEcancermedicalscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jens NeumannInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Straße 36, 80337, Munich, Germany. jens.neumann@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-441X
Volker HeinemannDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jutta EngelMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumor Centre (TZM) at the Department of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas KirchnerInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Straße 36, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian StintzingDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of CDX2 expression has been proposed to be a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) correlating with shorter overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Since metastatic disease, mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and the mutational status of BRAF are considered to be important prognostic determinants in CRC, the present study aimed to analyze CDX2 expression in correlation with these parameters. Immunohistochemistry for CDX2, hMLH1, and hMSH2 was applied to a study cohort of 503 CRC specimens (FIRE-3) and a matched case-control collection of 50 right-sided CRC specimens with synchronous distant metastases and 50 right-sided CRCs without distant metastases. Furthermore, the mutational status of BRAF gene was analyzed utilizing pyrosequencing. CDX2 expression significantly correlates with reduced OS (p = 0.008) within the study population. In both cohorts, a significant correlation of CDX2 expression and MMR deficiency as well as the presence of a BRAF mutation (each p > 0.001) was observed, whereas no correlation of CDX2 expression and synchronous metastasis could be obtained. In the case-control study, only patients with proficient MMR status showed a correlation of CDX2 loss and synchronous metastasis, whereas in patients with deficient MMR status and CDX2 loss, no distant metastases at the time of diagnosis were found (p = 0.003). We could demonstrate that the reduced OS of CDX2-negative CRC patients is not caused by higher rates of distant metastases. Furthermore, our data indicate that the prognostic impact of CDX2 depends on the MMR status and the BRAF mutational status of the tumors. Thus, it could be concluded that CDX2 is not an independent prognostic biomarker in CRC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCDX2 Transcription FactorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanCDX2 protein, humanCDX2 Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafCDX2Colorectal cancerDistant metastasisMMRSurvival

Identifiers

PMID29675807
OpenAlexW2801164416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.