Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29675697›Full record

GuidelineCardiovascular engineering and technology2018

Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment Associated with Transcatheter Heart Valve Prostheses: A Position Paper of the ISO Working Group.

Zhenglun Alan Wei, Simon Johannes Sonntag, Milan Toma, Shelly Singh-Gryzbon, Wei Sun

Abstract readGuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinical Impact of Computational Heart Valve Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhenglun Alan WeiWallace H. Coulter School of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technology Enterprise Park, Room 206, 387 Technology Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30313-2412, USA.
Simon Johannes Sonntagenmodes GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Milan TomaWallace H. Coulter School of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technology Enterprise Park, Room 206, 387 Technology Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30313-2412, USA.
Shelly Singh-GryzbonWallace H. Coulter School of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technology Enterprise Park, Room 206, 387 Technology Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30313-2412, USA.
Wei SunWallace H. Coulter School of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technology Enterprise Park, Room 206, 387 Technology Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30313-2412, USA. wei.sun@bme.gatech.edu.

Funding

Probabilistic Modeling of Stenotic Aortic Valve InterventionR01HL104080 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SUN, WEI · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The governing international standard for the development of prosthetic heart valves is International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5840. This standard requires the assessment of the thrombus potential of transcatheter heart valve substitutes using an integrated thrombus evaluation. Besides experimental flow field assessment and ex vivo flow testing, computational fluid dynamics is a critical component of this integrated approach. This position paper is intended to provide and discuss best practices for the setup of a computational model, numerical solving, post-processing, data evaluation and reporting, as it relates to transcatheter heart valve substitutes. This paper is not intended to be a review of current computational technology; instead, it represents the position of the ISO working group consisting of experts from academia and industry with regards to considerations for computational fluid dynamic assessment of transcatheter heart valve substitutes.

Indexed as

Heart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularAnimalsBenchmarkingBlood Flow VelocityComputer SimulationHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansHydrodynamicsMaterials TestingProsthesis DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStress, MechanicalThrombosisComputational fluid dynamicsFluid-structure interactionProsthetic heart valvesThrombus assessment

Identifiers

PMID29675697
PMCPMC6095731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.