ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2018
An easier Lichtenstein hernioplasty.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia in the Morbid Patients With Self-Gripping Mesh (ProgripFrontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Lichtenstein technique is used worldwide because of its rapid learning curve, good results and low recurrence rates. In this approach, a lateral tie-shaped incision is made on the mesh, involving the spermatic funiculus and thus correcting the deep inguinal ring defect by narrowing it. The lateral tie, however, does not prevent the wrinkling of the upper portion of the mesh that is caused by the arched shape of the inguinal ligament, where the lower edge of the prosthesis is sutured.
objectiveTo describe a variation of the Lichtenstein technique that is easy to perform, maintains the advantages and prevents wrinkling of the mesh and allows for better mesh accommodation in the inguinal region.
methodsThe main feature of this approach is to cut the mesh vertically and to make the tie over the spermatic cord by overlapping the two resulting portions without wrinkling them. The final appearance is clearly more anatomical, allowing the mesh to be perfectly adapted for each patient.
resultsWe operated on consecutive patients using this approach for more than 5 years. There have been no recurrences or specific mesh complications during follow-up, and the surgical aspect of this technique was clearly more anatomical.
conclusionsThis method appears to be easier to perform and the surgical aspects of the technique are more anatomical for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29675649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.