Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29675627›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2018

Rectal cancer MRI: protocols, signs and future perspectives radiologists should consider in everyday clinical practice.

Andrea Delli Pizzi, Raffaella Basilico, Roberta Cianci, Barbara Seccia, Mauro Timpani, Alessandra Tavoletta, Daniele Caposiena, Barbara Faricelli, Daniela Gabrielli, Massimo Caulo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MRI for Rectal Cancer: Updates and Controversies-AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multicentre, deep learning, synthetic-CT generation for ano-rectal MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer-repeatability of quantitative data: a feasibility study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Delli PizziITAB Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University "G. d'Annunzio", Via Luigi Polacchi, 11 66100, Chieti, Italy. andreadellipizzi@gmail.com.
Raffaella BasilicoSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Roberta CianciSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Barbara SecciaSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Mauro TimpaniSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Alessandra TavolettaSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Daniele CaposienaSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Barbara FaricelliSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Daniela GabrielliSS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Massimo CauloITAB Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University "G. d'Annunzio", Via Luigi Polacchi, 11 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows to non-invasively evaluate rectal cancer staging and to assess the presence of "prognostic signs" such as the distance from the anorectal junction, the mesorectal fascia infiltration and the extramural vascular invasion. Moreover, MRI plays a crucial role in the assessment of treatment response after chemo-radiation therapy, especially considering the growing interest in the new conservative policy (wait and see, minimally invasive surgery). We present a practical overview regarding the state of the art of the MRI protocol, the main signs that radiologists should consider for their reports during their clinical activity and future perspectives. TEACHING POINTS: • MRI protocol for rectal cancer staging and re-staging. • MRI findings that radiologists should consider for reports during everyday clinical activity. • Perspectives regarding the development of latest technologies.

Indexed as

Chemo-radiation treatment responseComplete respondersDiffusion-weighted imagingLocally advanced rectal cancerMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29675627
PMCPMC6108973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.