ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018
The Role of Central Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Management of Hypertension.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incremental value of 24-hour central systolic blood pressure based on blood pressure phenotypes for target organ damage in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- In Vivo Characterization of Central Arterial Properties Using a Miniaturized pMUT Array Compared to a Clinical Transducer: A Feasibility Study Towards Wearable Pulse Wave Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Associations of 24-Hour Central Systolic Blood Pressure With Multiorgan Damage in Nondialysis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in postmenopausal Korean women with grade 1 hypertension: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Clinical hypertension · 2021Article
- Increased arterial stiffness and reduced left ventricular long-axis function in patients recovered from peripartum cardiomyopathy.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2021Article
- Central rather than brachial pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes: A longitudinal prospective study in a Chinese population.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Tapered vs. Uniform Tube-Load Modeling of Blood Pressure Wave Propagation in Human Aorta.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Wave reflections and global arterial compliance during normal human pregnancy.Physiological reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCentral blood pressure is a novel predictor of cardiovascular risk that can be measured in the clinical setting using currently available technology. This paper will review current available methods of central blood pressure monitoring as well as its impact in cardiac and renal disease. RECENT
findingsBoth aortic and carotid systolic blood pressure are independently associated with cardiovascular mortality and serious cardiac events. Furthermore, studies show that systolic aortic blood pressure has been shown to be superior predictor of cardiovascular as compared to brachial blood pressure. Inhibitors of the renin angiotensin axis may have a beneficial effect on central blood pressure; however, long term studies evaluating the impact of lowering central blood pressure on clinical outcomes are lacking. Central blood pressure is a good predictor of cardiovascular risk. As more studies emerge demonstrating the value of central blood pressure as a therapeutic target, it is possible that targeting central blood pressure may become an important part of the armamentarium to lower cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29675613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.