Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29674962›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2018

Invaginating Structures in Mammalian Synapses.

Ronald S Petralia, Ya-Xian Wang, Mark P Mattson, Pamela J Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Introduction: What Are Dendritic Spines?Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Invaginating Structures in Synapses - Perspective.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Subcortical-Allocortical- NeocorticalFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. A dual role for CaeLife · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Area-Specific Synapse Structure in Branched Posterior Nucleus Axons Reveals a New Level of Complexity in Thalamocortical Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald S PetraliaAdvanced Imaging Core, NIDCD/NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ya-Xian WangAdvanced Imaging Core, NIDCD/NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Mark P MattsonLaboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Pamela J YaoLaboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, United States.
National Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Advanced Imaging CoreZICDC000081 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI WINKLER, DENNIS · 2012 to 2025
$17.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC DC000081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invaginating structures at chemical synapses in the mammalian nervous system exist in presynaptic axon terminals, postsynaptic spines or dendrites, and glial processes. These invaginating structures can be divided into three categories. The first category includes slender protrusions invaginating into axonal terminals, postsynaptic spines, or glial processes. Best known examples of this category are spinules extending from postsynaptic spines into presynaptic terminals in forebrain synapses. Another example of this category are protrusions from inhibitory presynaptic terminals invaginating into postsynaptic neuronal somas. Regardless of the direction and location, the invaginating structures of the first category do not have synaptic active zones within the invagination. The second category includes postsynaptic spines invaginating into presynaptic terminals, whereas the third category includes presynaptic terminals invaginating into postsynaptic spines or dendrites. Unlike the first category, the second and third categories have active zones within the invagination. An example of the second category are mossy terminal synapses of the hippocampal CA3 region, in which enlarged spine-like structures invaginate partly or entirely into mossy terminals. An example of the third category is the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) where substantial invaginations of the presynaptic terminals invaginate into the muscle fibers. In the retina, rod and cone synapses have invaginating processes from horizontal and bipolar cells. Because horizontal cells act both as post and presynaptic structures, their invaginating processes represent both the second and third category. These invaginating structures likely play broad yet specialized roles in modulating neuronal cell signaling.

Indexed as

CA3cannabinoidephaptichorizontal cellindentedneuromuscularretinaspinule

Identifiers

PMID29674962
PMCPMC5895750
OpenAlexW2796165761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.