Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29674627›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2018

cIAP1 regulates the EGFR/Snai2 axis in triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Maria Teresa Majorini, Giacomo Manenti, Miguel Mano, Loris De Cecco, Annalisa Conti, Patrizia Pinciroli, Enrico Fontanella, Elda Tagliabue, Claudia Chiodoni, Mario Paolo Colombo and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EGFR: New Insights on Its Activation and Mutation in Tumor and Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Targeting the BIR Domains of Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) Proteins in Cancer Treatment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Teresa MajoriniDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Unit, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo ManentiDepartment of Predictive & Preventive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Miguel ManoFunctional Genomics and RNA-Based Therapeutics Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3060-197, Portugal.
Loris De CeccoFunctional Genomics and Bioinformatics Core Facility, Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Annalisa ContiDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Unit, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia PinciroliFunctional Genomics and Bioinformatics Core Facility, Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Enrico FontanellaDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Unit, Milan, Italy.
Elda TagliabueDepartment of Experimental Oncology & Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Targeting Unit, Milan, Italy.
Claudia ChiodoniDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Immunology Unit, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-9969
Mario Paolo ColomboDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Immunology Unit, Milan, Italy.
Domenico DeliaDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Unit, Milan, Italy.
Daniele LecisDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Unit, Milan, Italy. daniele.lecis@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0564-0563
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITItalian Institute of Technology · ITUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins constitute a family of conserved molecules that regulate both apoptosis and receptor signaling. They are often deregulated in cancer cells and represent potential targets for therapy. In our work, we investigated the effect of IAP inhibition in vivo to identify novel downstream genes expressed in an IAP-dependent manner that could contribute to cancer aggressiveness. To this end, immunocompromised mice engrafted subcutaneously with the triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB231 cell line were treated with SM83, a Smac mimetic that acts as a pan-IAP inhibitor, and tumor nodules were profiled for gene expression. SM83 reduced the expression of Snai2, an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition factor often associated with increased stem-like properties and metastatic potential especially in breast cancer cells. By testing several breast cancer cell lines, we demonstrated that Snai2 downregulation prevents cell motility and that its expression is promoted by cIAP1. In fact, the chemical or genetic inhibition of cIAP1 blocked epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and caused the reduction of Snai2 transcription levels. In a number of breast cancer cell lines, cIAP1 depletion also resulted in a reduction of EGFR protein levels which derived from the decrease of its gene transcription, though, paradoxically, the silencing of cIAP1 promoted EGFR protein stability rather than its degradation. Finally, we provided evidence that IAP inhibition displays an anti-tumor and anti-metastasis effect in vivo. In conclusion, our work indicates that IAP-targeted therapy could contribute to EGFR inhibition and to the reduction of its downstream mediators. This approach could be particularly effective in tumors characterized by high levels of EGFR and Snai2, such as triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsInjections, IntraperitonealMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDOligopeptidesSnail Family Transcription FactorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic AgentsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsOligopeptidesSMAC peptideSNAI2 protein, humanSnail Family Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29674627
PMCPMC6262016
OpenAlexW2801333791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.