Complete Genome Sequence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens 1D1609.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Function and regulation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
   Article
2. The History of Agrobacterium Rhizogenes: From Pathogen to a Multitasking Platform for Biotechnology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
   Review
3. Modular evolution of secretion systems and virulence plasmids in a bacterial species complex.BMC biology · 2022
   Article
4. Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between TwoFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
   Article
5. Presence of an Agrobacterium-Type Tumor-Inducing Plasmid in Neorhizobium sp. NCHU2750 and the Link to Phytopathogenicity.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
   Article
6. More than Rotating Flagella: Lipopolysaccharide as a Secondary Receptor for Flagellotropic Phage 7-7-1.Journal of bacteriology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.