Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29674450›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Inferring genetic connectivity in real populations, exemplified by coastal and oceanic Atlantic cod.

Ingrid Spies, Lorenz Hauser, Per Erik Jorde, Halvor Knutsen, André E Punt, Lauren A Rogers, Nils Chr Stenseth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingrid SpiesNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA 98115; ingrid.spies@noaa.gov n.c.stenseth@ibv.uio.no.
Lorenz HauserSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5020.
Per Erik JordeCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Halvor KnutsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.
André E PuntSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5020.
Lauren A RogersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA 98115.
Nils Chr StensethCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; ingrid.spies@noaa.gov n.c.stenseth@ibv.uio.no.
University of Agder · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Washington · USNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic data are commonly used to estimate connectivity between putative populations, but translating them to demographic dispersal rates is complicated. Theoretical equations that infer a migration rate based on the genetic estimator

Indexed as

Animal MigrationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleGadus morhuaMalefisheries managementgenetic connectivitypopulation dynamicspopulation genetic theoryWright’s equation

Identifiers

PMID29674450
PMCPMC5948993
OpenAlexW2799909156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.