Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673973›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances

Using agro-industrial wastes for the cultivation of microalgae and duckweeds: Contamination risks and biomass safety concerns.

Giorgos Markou, Liang Wang, Jianfeng Ye, Adrian Unc

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fortification ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  8. Lemnaceae as Novel Crop Candidates for COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A New Green Model for the Bioremediation and Resource Utilization of Livestock Wastewater.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The Structural Difference of IsobaricFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Giorgos MarkouInstitute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization - Demeter, Leof. Sofokli Venizelou 1, Likovrysi 141 23, Greece. Electronic address: markoug@aua.gr.
Liang WangWater Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, 508 Qinzhou Rd, Shanghai 200233, China.
Jianfeng YeWater Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, 508 Qinzhou Rd, Shanghai 200233, China.
Adrian UncSchool of Science and the Environment, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 20 University Drive, Corner Brook, NL A2H 5G4, Canada.
Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences · CNMemorial University of Newfoundland · CANational Agricultural Research Foundation · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic organisms, such as microalgae (Chlorella, Arthrospira (Spirulina), Tetrasselmis, Dunalliela etc.) and duckweed (Lemna spp., Wolffia spp. etc.) are a potential source for the production of protein-rich biomass and for numerous other high-value compounds (fatty acids, pigments, vitamins etc.). Their cultivation using agro-industrial wastes and wastewater (WaW) is of particular interest in the context of a circular economy, not only for recycling valuable nutrients but also for reducing the requirements for fresh water for the production of biomass. Recovery and recycling of nutrients is an unavoidable long-term approach for securing future food and feed production. Agro-industrial WaW are rich in nutrients and have been widely considered as a potential nutrient source for the cultivation of microalgae/duckweed. However, they commonly contain various hazardous contaminants, which could potentially taint the produced biomass, raising various concerns about the safety of their consumption. Herein, an overview of the most important contaminants, including heavy metals and metalloids, pathogens (bacteria, viruses, parasites etc.), and xenobiotics (hormones, antibiotics, parasiticides etc.) is given. It is concluded that pretreatment and processing of WaW is a requisite step for the removal of several contaminants. Among the various technologies, anaerobic digestion (AD) is widely used in practice and offers a technologically mature approach for WaW treatment. During AD, various organic and biological contaminants are significantly removed. Further removal of contaminants could be achieved by post-treatment and processing of digestates (solid/liquid separation, dilution etc.) to further decrease the concentration of contaminants. Moreover, during cultivation an additional removal may occur through various mechanisms, such as precipitation, degradation, and biotransformation. Since many jurisdictions regulate the presence of various contaminants in feed or food setting strict safety monitoring processes, it would be of particular interest to initiate a multi-disciplinary discussion whether agro-industrial WaW ought to be used to cultivate microalgae/duckweed for feed or food production and identify most feasible options for doing this safely. Based on the current body of knowledge it is estimated that AD and post-treatment of WaW can lower significantly the risks associated with heavy metals and pathogens, but it is yet unclear to what extent this is the case for certain persistent xenobiotics.

Indexed as

AraceaeBiomassIndustrial WasteMicroalgaeAgricultureAnimal FeedCell Culture TechniquesChlorellaIndustrial WasteAgro-industrial waste and wastewaterContaminationDuckweedsFeedFoodMicroalgaeSafety

Identifiers

PMID29673973
PMCPMC7125918
OpenAlexW2802917504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.