Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673860›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2018

The endogenous circadian clock programs animals to eat at certain times of the 24-hour day: What if we ignore the clock?

Peng Jiang, Fred W Turek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genetics of Circadian Rhythms.Neurologic clinics · 2019
    Review
  4. Circadian rhythms: a regulator of gastrointestinal health and dysfunction.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng JiangCenter for Sleep & Circadian Biology, Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Fred W TurekCenter for Sleep & Circadian Biology, Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address: fturek@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

SLOW WAVE SLEEP AND TYPE 2 DIABETES RISK IN AGINGP01AG011412 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZEE, PHYLLIS C. · 1994 to 2021
$31.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG011412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the molecular mechanisms underlying the circadian clock, which functions in virtually every cell throughout the body to coordinate biological processes to anticipate and better adapt to daily rhythmic changes in the environment, is one of the major biomedical breakthroughs in the 20th century. Twenty years after this breakthrough, the biomedical community is now at a new frontier to incorporate the circadian clock mechanisms into many areas of biomedical research, as studies continue to reveal an important role of the circadian clock in a wide range of biological functions and diseases. A forefront of this exciting area is the research of interactions between the clock and energy metabolism. In this review, we summarize animal and human studies linking disruptions of the circadian clock, either environmental or genetic, to metabolic dysfunctions associated with obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic disorders. We also discuss how these advances in circadian biology may pave the way to revolutionize clinical practice in the era of precision medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorHumansMetabolic DiseasesPrecision MedicineCircadian clockDiabetesEnergy metabolismObesity

Identifiers

PMID29673860
PMCPMC6087672
OpenAlexW2799341869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.