Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673483›Full record

ArticleNeuron2018

Training Humans to Categorize Monkey Calls: Auditory Feature- and Category-Selective Neural Tuning Changes.

Xiong Jiang, Mark A Chevillet, Josef P Rauschecker, Maximilian Riesenhuber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evidence for a Spoken Word Lexicon in the Auditory Ventral Stream.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Learning nonnative speech sounds changes local encoding in the adult human cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiong JiangDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Mark A ChevilletDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Josef P RauscheckerDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; Institute for Advanced Study, Technische Universität München, Germany.
Maximilian RiesenhuberDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: mr287@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grouping auditory stimuli into common categories is essential for a variety of auditory tasks, including speech recognition. We trained human participants to categorize auditory stimuli from a large novel set of morphed monkey vocalizations. Using fMRI-rapid adaptation (fMRI-RA) and multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) techniques, we gained evidence that categorization training results in two distinct sets of changes: sharpened tuning to monkey call features (without explicit category representation) in left auditory cortex and category selectivity for different types of calls in lateral prefrontal cortex. In addition, the sharpness of neural selectivity in left auditory cortex, as estimated with both fMRI-RA and MVPA, predicted the steepness of the categorical boundary, whereas categorical judgment correlated with release from adaptation in the left inferior frontal gyrus. These results support the theory that auditory category learning follows a two-stage model analogous to the visual domain, suggesting general principles of perceptual category learning in the human brain.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleHaplorhiniHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexVocalization, AnimalYoung Adultauditory learningcategorizationfMRIfMRI-RAlearningmonkey callsMVPAneural plasticityobject recognition&ZeroWidthSpace

Identifiers

PMID29673483
PMCPMC7371447
OpenAlexW2799696550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.