Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673397›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2018

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements.

Jason Bouffard, Chen Yang, Mickael Begon, Julie Côté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex differences in visuomotor tracking.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding sex differences in the regulation of cancer-induced muscle wasting.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason BouffardDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, H2W 1S4, Qc, Canada. Jason.bouffard@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-5899
Chen YangDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, H2W 1S4, Qc, Canada.
Mickael BegonDépartement de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Laval, H7N 0A5, Qc, Canada.
Julie CôtéDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, H2W 1S4, Qc, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MFE-146666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task.

methodsForty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures.

resultsMen (7.4 ± 3.2 min) and women (8.3 ± 4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder's and elbow's decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] - 1.63) than in women (SRM - 1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42).

conclusionDespite many similarities between men's and women's response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men's shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women's despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMovementMuscle FatigueUpper ExtremityYoung AdultAdaptationFatigueGenderKinematicsMusculoskeletal disordersSex differencesShoulderUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID29673397
PMCPMC5907702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.