Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673346›Full record

ReviewHealth research policy and systems2018

Elements for harnessing participatory action research to strengthen health managers' capacity: a critical interpretative synthesis.

Moses Tetui, Joseph Mumba Zulu, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Suzanne N Kiwanuka, Anna-Britt Coe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Human Factors Affecting Health Service Managers: A Qualitative Study.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moses TetuiMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH), New Mulago Complex, P.O. B0X 7072, Kampala, Uganda. tetuimoses@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-7601
Joseph Mumba ZuluSchool of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
Anna-Karin HurtigEpidemiology and Global Health Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Elizabeth Ekirapa-KirachoMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH), New Mulago Complex, P.O. B0X 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Suzanne N KiwanukaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MakCHS-SPH), New Mulago Complex, P.O. B0X 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Anna-Britt CoeSociology Department, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Comic Relief 112483Swedish council for working life and social research 2006-1512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth managers play a key role in ensuring that health services are responsive to the needs of the population. Participatory action research (PAR) is one of the approaches that have been used to strengthen managers' capacity. However, collated knowledge on elements for harnessing PAR to strengthen managers' capacity is missing. This paper bridges this gap by reviewing existing literature on the subject matter.

methodsA critical interpretive synthesis method was used to interrogate eight selected articles. These articles reported the use of PAR to strengthen health managers' capacity. The critical interpretive synthesis method's approach to analysis guided the synthesis. Here, the authors interpretively made connections and linkages between different elements identified in the literature. Finally, the Atun et al. (Heal Pol Plann, 25:104-111, 2010) framework on integration was used to model the elements synthesised in the literature into five main domains.

resultsFive elements with intricate bi-directional interactions were identified in the literature reviewed. These included a shared purpose, skilled facilitation and psychological safety, activity integration into organisational procedures, organisational support, and external supportive monitoring. A shared purpose of the managers' capacity strengthening initiative created commitment and motivation to learn. This purpose was built upon a set of facilitation skills that included promoting participation, self-efficacy and reflection, thereby creating a safe psychological space within which the managers interacted and learnt from each other and their actions. Additionally, an integrated intervention strengthened local capacity and harnessed organisational support for learning. Finally, supportive monitoring from external partners, such as researchers, ensured quality, building of local capacity and professional safety networks essential for continued learning.

conclusionsThe five elements identified in this synthesis provide a basis upon which the use of PAR can be harnessed, not only to strengthen health managers' capacity, but also to foster other health systems strengthening initiatives involving implementation research. In addition, the findings demonstrated the intricate and complex relations between the elements, which further affirms the need for a systems thinking approach to tackling health systems challenges.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelCapacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansLearningProblem Solvingfactorsharnessinghealth managers’ capacityimplementation researchParticipatory Action Researchsystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID29673346
PMCPMC5907405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.