Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673327›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Assessing the benefits of horizontal gene transfer by laboratory evolution and genome sequencing.

Hoi Yee Chu, Kathleen Sprouffske, Andreas Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The evolution of autonomy from two cooperative specialists in fluctuating environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recombination resolves the cost of horizontal gene transfer in experimental populations ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Adaptive evolution of hybrid bacteria by horizontal gene transfer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Horizontal gene transfer potentiates adaptation by reducing selective constraints on the spread of genetic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Experimental manipulation of selfish genetic elements links genes to microbial community function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hoi Yee ChuInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kathleen SprouffskeThe Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge - Batiment Genopode, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andreas WagnerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. andreas.wagner@ieu.uzh.ch.
University of Zurich · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 739874SystemsX.ch EpiphysX RTD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecombination is widespread across the tree of life, because it helps purge deleterious mutations and creates novel adaptive traits. In prokaryotes, it often takes the form of horizontal gene transfer from a donor to a recipient bacterium. While such transfer is widespread in natural communities, its immediate fitness benefits are usually unknown. We asked whether any such benefits depend on the environment, and on the identity of donor and recipient strains. To this end, we adapted Escherichia coli to two novel carbon sources over several hundred generations of laboratory evolution, exposing evolving populations to various DNA donors.

resultsAt the end of these experiments, we measured fitness and sequenced the genomes of 65 clones from 34 replicate populations to study the genetic changes associated with adaptive evolution. Furthermore, we identified candidate de novo beneficial mutations. During adaptive evolution on the first carbon source, 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid (HPA), recombining populations adapted better, which was likely mediated by acquiring the hpa operon from the donor. In contrast, recombining populations did not adapt better to the second carbon source, butyric acid, even though they suffered fewer extinctions than non-recombining populations. The amount of DNA transferred, but not its benefit, strongly depended on the donor-recipient strain combination.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the genomic consequences of prokaryotic recombination and horizontal gene transfer during laboratory evolution. It shows that the benefits of recombination strongly depend on the environment and the foreign DNA donor.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionGenome, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNAAdaptation, PhysiologicalBase SequenceButyric AcidEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGene Transfer, HorizontalMutationOpen Reading FramesOperonPhenotypePhenylacetates4-hydroxyphenylacetic acidButyric AcidPhenylacetatesExperimental evolutionHorizontal gene transferNovel nutrient adaptation

Identifiers

PMID29673327
PMCPMC5909237
OpenAlexW2806047877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.