Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29673108›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2018

Lenalidomide versus lenalidomide + dexamethasone prolonged treatment after second-line lenalidomide + dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma.

Johan Lund, Astrid Gruber, Birgitta Lauri, Adil Doganay Duru, Cecilie Blimark, Agneta Swedin, Markus Hansson, Karin Forsberg, Lucia Ahlberg, Conny Carlsson and 10 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled TrialObservational Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01430546 completednot on this map

Phase IV Study on QoL in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma When Treated With Lenalidomide

TypeobservationalSponsorHareth NahiRan2010Enrolled133ConditionsMultiple Myeloma
NCT01450215 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized Trial Comparing Lenalidomide With Low Dose Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide in Second Line Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2011Enrolled62ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsRevlimid
NCT01937442 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Thalidomide Following Multiple Oral Dosing in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2013 to 2015Enrolled7ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsThalidomide Celgene™
NCT02348528 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Open-label Extended Access Program of Lenalidomide Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone in Chinese Subjects With Relapsed/Refactory Multiple Myeloma Who Participated in Study CC-5013-MM-021 for at Least One Year.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2012 to 2016Enrolled65ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsLenalidomide, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Lenalidomide use in multiple myeloma (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Johan LundDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-8168
Astrid GruberDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Birgitta LauriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.
Adil Doganay DuruDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilie BlimarkDepartment of Hematology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Agneta SwedinDepartment of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Markus HanssonDepartment of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Karin ForsbergDepartment of Hematology, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Lucia AhlbergDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden.
Conny CarlssonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallands Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.
Anders WaageDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Peter GimsingDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette Juul VangstedDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulf FrølundDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Erik HolmbergDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gösta GahrtonDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Evren AliciDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats HardlingDepartment of Hematology, Uddevalla Hospital, Uddevalla, Sweden.
Ulf-Henrik MellqvistDepartment of Hematology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hareth NahiDepartment of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SERoskilde University · DKSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESkåne University Hospital · SEHallands sjukhus Halmstad · SELinköping University Hospital · SENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NORigshospitalet · DKSunderby sjukhus · SEUddevalla sjukhus · SEUniversity Hospital of Umeå · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). It is possible that single-agent Len may be effective as prolonged treatment regimen in RRMM once patients demonstrate an initial response to Len+Dex induction. Patients with RRMM who responded to first-line Len+Dex in an observational study (NCT01430546) received up to 24 cycles of either Len (25 mg/day) or Len+Dex (25 mg/day and 40 mg/week) as prolonged treatment in a subsequent phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01450215). In the observational study (N = 133), median time to response was 1.7 (range 0.6-9.6) months. A complete response to all treatments received in both studies was observed in 11% of patients; very good partial response and partial response rates were 31% and 38%, respectively. Corresponding response rates in the subgroup of patients who did not enter the phase 2 trial (n = 71) were 3%, 18%, and 39%, respectively. Rates of disease progression at 2 years in the phase 2 trial were 47% versus 31% for Len versus Len+Dex (P = 0.14). After 36 months median follow-up in surviving patients, median time to progression was not reached with Len+Dex and was 24.9 months (95% confidence interval 12.5-not calculable, P < 0.001) with Len. Three-year OS among the total observational study population was 61% (95% CI, 52-69%). The corresponding rate among patients who entered the phase 2 clinical trial was 73% (95% CI, 60-83%) and was significantly lower among those patients who achieved ≥PR but did not proceed into the phase 2 trial (55%; P = 0.01). In the phase 2 trial, OS was 73% in both treatment arms (P = 0.70). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with prolonged (phase 2 trial) versus short-term (observational study) Len administration but remained manageable. Prolonged treatment with Len with or without Dex provides sustained, clinically relevant responses and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneFemaleHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneLenalidomideClinical TrialLenalidomideMultiple Myeloma

Identifiers

PMID29673108
PMCPMC6010717
OpenAlexW2799670877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.