Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29672985›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2018

The impact of buprenorphine and methadone on mortality: a primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom.

Matthew Hickman, Colin Steer, Kate Tilling, Aaron G Lim, John Marsden, Tim Millar, John Strang, Maggie Telfer, Peter Vickerman, John Macleod

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Buprenorphine enhancesJournal of oral microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew HickmanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-459X
Colin SteerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kate TillingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Aaron G LimPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
John MarsdenAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-2498
Tim MillarCentre for Mental Health and Safety, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John StrangAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-2725
Maggie TelferBristol Drug Project, Bristol, UK.
Peter VickermanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-5890
John MacleodPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBKing's College London · GBAt Bristol · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/136/105Medical Research Council G1000021Medical Research Council MC_PC_17210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo estimate whether opioid substitution treatment (OST) with buprenorphine or methadone is associated with a greater reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and opioid drug-related poisoning (DRP) mortality.

designCohort study with linkage between clinical records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and mortality register.

settingUK primary care.

participantsA total of 11 033 opioid-dependent patients who received OST from 1998 to 2014, followed-up for 30 410 person-years. MEASUREMENTS: Exposure to methadone (17 373, 61%) OST episodes or buprenorphine (9173, 39%) OST episodes. ACM was available for all patients; information on cause of death and DRP was available for 5935 patients (54%) followed-up for 16 363 person-years. Poisson regression modelled mortality by treatment period with an interaction between OST type and treatment period (first 4 weeks on OST, rest of time off OST, first 4 weeks off OST, rest of time out of OST censored at 12 months) to test whether ACM or DRP differed between methadone and buprenorphine. Inverse probability weights were included to adjust for confounding and balance characteristics of patients prescribed methadone or buprenorphine.

findingsACM and DRP rates were 1.93 and 0.53 per 100 person-years, respectively. DRP was elevated during the first 4 weeks of OST [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.93 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-3.82], the first 4 weeks off OST (IRR = 8.15, 95% CI = 5.45-12.19) and the rest of time out of OST (IRR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.47-3.09) compared with mortality risk from 4 weeks to end of treatment. Patients on buprenorphine compared with methadone had lower ACM rates in each treatment period. After adjustment, there was evidence of a lower DRP risk for patients on buprenorphine compared with methadone at treatment initiation (IRR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01-0.48) and rest of time on treatment (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.79). Treatment duration (mean and median) was shorter on buprenorphine than methadone (173 and 40 versus 363 and 111, respectively). Model estimates suggest that there was a low probability that methadone or buprenorphine reduced the number of DRP in the population: 28 and 21%, respectively.

conclusionsIn UK general medical practice, opioid substitution treatment with buprenorphine is associated with a lower risk of all-cause and drug-related poisoning mortality than methadone. In the population, buprenorphine is unlikely to give greater overall protection because of the relatively shorter duration of treatment.

Indexed as

AdultBuprenorphineCause of DeathCohort StudiesDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedMortalityNarcoticsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareUnited KingdomBuprenorphineMethadoneNarcoticsBuprenorphinedrug related deathsmethadonemortalityopioidsopioid substitution treatmenttreatment cohort

Identifiers

PMID29672985
PMCPMC6282737
OpenAlexW2799522112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.