Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29672714›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2018

Effects of Long-Term Denosumab on Bone Histomorphometry and Mineralization in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

David W Dempster, Jacques P Brown, Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer, David Kendler, Sebastien Rizzo, Ivo Valter, Rachel B Wagman, Xiang Yin, Susan V Yue, Georges Boivin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00523341 (An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00523341 phase3completednot on this map

An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab (AMG162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2007 to 2015Enrolled4,550ConditionsOsteopenia, OsteoporosisArmsDenosumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Data for Parametrization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Palopegteriparatide for adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism: skeletal dynamics through 3 years of the phase 2 PaTH forward trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Comparative bone histomorphometry effects of combined denosumab and teriparatide vs monotherapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Reduction of Cortical Bone Turnover and Erosion Depth After 2 and 3 Years of Denosumab: Iliac Bone Histomorphometry in the FREEDOM Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  7. Building bone in the jaw with denosumab in adult Langerhans cell histiocytosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Differences in bone histomorphometry between White postmenopausal women with and without atypical femoral fracture after long-term bisphosphonate therapy.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

David W DempsterDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jacques P BrownDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University and CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Astrid Fahrleitner-PammerDepartment for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
David KendlerDepartment of Medicine (Endocrinology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sebastien RizzoBone and Chronic Diseases, INSERM, UMR 1033, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Ivo ValterCenter for Clinical and Basic Research, Tallinn, Estonia.
Rachel B WagmanClinical Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
Xiang YinClinical Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
Susan V YueClinical Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
Georges BoivinBone and Chronic Diseases, INSERM, UMR 1033, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Amgen (United States) · USColumbia University · USInserm · FRMedical University of Graz · ATUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAVähiuuringute Tehnoloogia Arenduskeskus · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Denosumab is a potent antiresorptive agent that reduces fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Objective: Determine effects of up to 10 years of denosumab on bone histology, remodeling, and matrix mineralization characteristics. Design and Setting: International, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial [Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM)] with a long-term open-label extension. Patients: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (92 women in FREEDOM, 46 in extension) who provided iliac bone biopsies, including 11 who provided biopsies at multiple time points. Interventions: FREEDOM subjects were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg or placebo every 6 months for 3 years. Long-term extension subjects continued receiving denosumab, open-label, for 7 additional years. Outcomes: Bone histology, histomorphometry, matrix mineralization. Results: Ten-year denosumab biopsies showed normal histology. Bone histomorphometry indicated normal bone structure and reduced bone remodeling after 10 years of denosumab, similar to levels after 2 and/or 3 and 5 years of denosumab. The degree of mineralization of bone was increased and mineralization heterogeneity was reduced in the denosumab years 2/3 group vs placebo. Changes in these mineralization variables progressed from years 2/3 to year 5 of denosumab, but not thereafter. Conclusions: Denosumab for 2/3, 5, and 10 years was associated with normal histology, low bone remodeling rate, increased matrix mineralization, and lower mineralization heterogeneity compared with placebo. These variables were unchanged from year 5 to year 10. These data, in combination with the maintenance of low fracture rates for up to 10 years as previously reported with denosumab therapy, suggest that strong, prolonged remodeling inhibition does not impair bone strength.

Indexed as

AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingCalcification, PhysiologicDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumab

Identifiers

PMID29672714
PMCPMC6037073
OpenAlexW2799344183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.