Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29672568›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis of Amaranthus palmeri with differential tolerance to glufosinate herbicide.

Reiofeli A Salas-Perez, Christopher A Saski, Rooksana E Noorai, Subodh K Srivastava, Amy L Lawton-Rauh, Robert L Nichols, Nilda Roma-Burgos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Confirmation and inheritance of glufosinate resistance in anPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reiofeli A Salas-PerezDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Christopher A SaskiDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Rooksana E NooraiDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Subodh K SrivastavaDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Amy L Lawton-RauhDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Robert L NicholsCotton Incorporated, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nilda Roma-BurgosDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-6873
Clemson University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USCotton (United States) · US

Funding

The role of acetate fermentation in Entamoeba histolytica growth and infectionP20GM109094 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, MEREDITH T · 2016 to 2020
$10.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109094NIH HHS P20GM109094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amaranthus palmeri (Amaranthaceae) is a noxious weed in several agroecosystems and in some cases seriously threatens the sustainability of crop production in North America. Glyphosate-resistant Amaranthus species are widespread, prompting the use of alternatives to glyphosate such as glufosinate, in conjunction with glufosinate-resistant crop cultivars, to help control glyphosate-resistant weeds. An experiment was conducted to analyze the transcriptome of A. palmeri plants that survived exposure to 0.55 kg ha-1 glufosinate. Since there was no record of glufosinate use at the collection site, survival of plants within the population are likely due to genetic expression that pre-dates selection; in the formal parlance of weed science this is described as natural tolerance. Leaf tissues from glufosinate-treated and non-treated seedlings were harvested 24 h after treatment (HAT) for RNA-Seq analysis. Global gene expression was measured using Illumina DNA sequence reads from non-treated and treated surviving (presumably tolerant, T) and susceptible (S) plants. The same plants were used to determine the mechanisms conferring differential tolerance to glufosinate. The S plants accumulated twice as much ammonia as did the T plants, 24 HAT. The relative copy number of the glufosinate target gene GS2 did not differ between T and S plants, with 1 to 3 GS2 copies in both biotypes. A reference cDNA transcriptome consisting of 72,780 contigs was assembled, with 65,282 sequences putatively annotated. Sequences of GS2 from the transcriptome assembly did not have polymorphisms unique to the tolerant plants. Five hundred sixty-seven genes were differentially expressed between treated T and S plants. Of the upregulated genes in treated T plants, 210 were more highly induced than were the upregulated genes in the treated S plants. Glufosinate-tolerant plants had greater induction of ABC transporter, glutathione S-transferase (GST), NAC transcription factor, nitronate monooxygenase (NMO), chitin elicitor receptor kinase (CERK1), heat shock protein 83, ethylene transcription factor, heat stress transcription factor, NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, ABA 8'-hydroxylase, and cytochrome P450 genes (CYP72A, CYP94A1). Seven candidate genes were selected for validation using quantitative real time-PCR. While GST was upregulated in treated tolerant plants in at least one population, CYP72A219 was consistently highly expressed in all treated tolerant biotypes. These genes are candidates for contributing tolerance to glufosinate. Taken together, these results show that differential induction of stress-protection genes in a population can enable some individuals to survive herbicide application. Elevated expression of detoxification-related genes can get fixed in a population with sustained selection pressure, leading to evolution of resistance. Alternatively, sustained selection pressure could select for mutation(s) in the GS2 gene with the same consequence.

Indexed as

AmaranthusAmmoniaBiomassDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseGlycineGlyphosateHerbicide ResistanceHerbicidesPhenotypePlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant WeedsAmmoniaGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29672568
PMCPMC5908165
OpenAlexW2800519733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.