Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29672167›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2018

Sex differences in opioid use and medical issues during buprenorphine/naloxone treatment.

Celestina Barbosa-Leiker, Sterling McPherson, Matthew E Layton, Ekaterina Burduli, John M Roll, Walter Ling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in buprenorphine treatment from emergency departments by discharge diagnosis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celestina Barbosa-Leikera College of Nursing , Washington State University , Spokane , WA , USA.
Sterling McPhersonb Program of Excellence in Addictions Research , Washington State University , Spokane , WA , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-4772
Matthew E Laytonb Program of Excellence in Addictions Research , Washington State University , Spokane , WA , USA.
Ekaterina Burdulib Program of Excellence in Addictions Research , Washington State University , Spokane , WA , USA.
John M Rollb Program of Excellence in Addictions Research , Washington State University , Spokane , WA , USA.
Walter Linge Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine , University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Washington State University Spokane · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK: PACIFIC NORTHWEST NODEU10DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DONOVAN, DENNIS MICHAEL, ROLL, JOHN M. · 2001 to 2015
$25.5M
Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are sex differences in buprenorphine/naloxone clinical trials for opioid use. While women have fewer opioid-positive urine samples, relative to men, a significant decrease in opioid-positive samples was found during treatment for men, but not women. In order to inform sex-based approaches to improve treatment outcomes, research is needed to determine if opioid use, and predictors of opioid use, differs between men and women during treatment.

objectivesTo test for sex differences in opioid use during a buprenorphine/naloxone clinical trial and determine if sex differences exist in the associations between addiction-related problem areas and opioid use over the course of the trial.

methodThis secondary data analysis of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) 0003 examined sex differences (men = 347, women = 169) in opioid-positive samples in a randomized clinical trial comparing 7-day vs. 28-day buprenorphine/naloxone tapering strategies. Addiction-related problem areas were defined by Addiction Severity-Lite (ASI-L) domain composite scores.

resultsWomen were more likely than men to use opioids during the course of the buprenorphine/naloxone clinical trial (B = .33, p = .01) and medical issues were positively related to submitting an opioid-positive sample during treatment for women (B = 1.67, p = .01). No ASI-L domain composite score was associated with opioid-positive samples during treatment for men.

conclusionWomen were more likely than men to use opioids during the course of the buprenorphine/naloxone clinical trial, and medical issues predicted opioid use during treatment for women but not men. Complementary treatment for medical problems during opioid replacement therapy may benefit women.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdultBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeBuprenorphineNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsaddiction severity indexbuprenorphine/naloxoneOpioid dependencesex differences

Identifiers

PMID29672167
PMCPMC6186400
OpenAlexW2800254292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.