Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29672152›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2018

Islamophobia, Health, and Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.

Goleen Samari, Héctor E Alcalá, Mienah Zulfacar Sharif

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
35.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BiSocial sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Goleen SamariGoleen Samari is with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco. Héctor E. Alcalá is with the Department of Family, Population and Preventative Medicine, Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. Mienah Zulfacar Sharif is with the Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Héctor E AlcaláGoleen Samari is with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco. Héctor E. Alcalá is with the Department of Family, Population and Preventative Medicine, Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. Mienah Zulfacar Sharif is with the Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Mienah Zulfacar SharifGoleen Samari is with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco. Héctor E. Alcalá is with the Department of Family, Population and Preventative Medicine, Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. Mienah Zulfacar Sharif is with the Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
University of California System · US

Funding

Statistics and Methods CoreR24HD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SELTZER, JUDITH A. · 2001 to 2016
$10.1M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR POPULATION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007545 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ, Megan M Sweeney · 2001 to 2026
$4.1M
Economics and Demography of Aging TrainingT32AG033533 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BIANCHI, SUZANNE M., COSTA, DORA L · 2011 to 2015
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG033533NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041022NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2017, a "Muslim ban" on immigrants to the United States was coupled with a continued rise in Islamophobia and hate crimes toward Muslims. Islamophobia undermines health equity, yet delineating the effects of Islamophobia globally is challenging as it affects a myriad of groups (geographically, racially, and socially). Additionally, stereotypes equate all Muslims with populations from the Middle East and South Asia. To date, health research pays insufficient attention to Islamophobia, Muslims, and those racialized to be Muslim.

objectivesThis literature review advances our understanding of racism and health by examining the racialization of religion, by specifically examining Islamophobia as a form of discrimination. SEARCH

methodsPer PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a search in October 2017 using PubMed-MEDLINE and a combination of terms. We identified additional articles using other search engines. For inclusion, articles needed to include a descriptor of discrimination, contain an identifier of Muslim or Muslim-like identity (i.e., groups commonly perceived as Muslim, including Arabs, Middle Easterners, North Africans, and South Asians), include a health outcome, be in English, and be published between 1990 and 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We identified 111 unique peer-reviewed articles. We excluded articles that did not meet the following criteria: (1) examined Islamophobia, discrimination, or racism among a Muslim or Muslim-like population; (2) included a health outcome or discussion of health disparities; and (3) was conducted in North America, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. This yielded 53 articles.

resultsThe majority of studies (n = 34; 64%) were quantitative. The remaining studies were qualitative (n = 7; 13%), mixed methods (n = 2; 4%), or reviews (n = 10; 19%). Most studies were based in the United States (n = 31; 58%). Nearly half of the reviewed studies examined mental health (n = 24; 45%), and one fourth examined physical health or health behaviors (n = 13; 25%). Others focused on both physical and mental health (n = 10; 19%) or health care seeking (n = 7; 13%). Studies showed associations between Islamophobia and poor mental health, suboptimal health behaviors, and unfavorable health care-seeking behaviors.

conclusionsThis study elucidates the associations between Islamophobia, health, and socioecological determinants of health. Future studies should examine the intersectional nature of Islamophobia and include validated measures, representative samples, subgroup analyses, and comparison groups. More methodologically rigorous studies of Islamophobia and health are needed. Public Health Implications. Addressing the discrimination-related poor health that Muslims and racialized Muslim-like subgroups experience is central to the goals of health equity and assurance of the fundamental right to health.

Indexed as

IslamRacismBiasHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID29672152
PMCPMC5944883
OpenAlexW2799498546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.