Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29671903›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

A review of mycoplasma diagnostics in cattle.

Alysia M Parker, Paul A Sheehy, Mark S Hazelton, Katrina L Bosward, John K House

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of bovine respiratory disease on the respiratory microbiome: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Serological evidence and risk factors ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and molecular characterization of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae associated with respiratory infection in sheep and goats in South India.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Pathogenomics of the RespiratoryPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Management and biosecurity practices associated withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  14. Identification ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Presence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alysia M ParkerSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-8645
Paul A SheehySydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark S HazeltonSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.
Katrina L BoswardSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.
John K HouseSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma species have a global distribution causing serious diseases in cattle worldwide including mastitis, arthritis, pneumonia, otitis media and reproductive disorders. Mycoplasma species are typically highly contagious, are capable of causing severe disease, and are difficult infections to resolve requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to prevent and control disease outbreaks. This review discusses the development and use of different diagnostic methods to identify Mycoplasma species relevant to cattle, with a particular focus on Mycoplasma bovis. Traditionally, the identification and diagnosis of mycoplasma has been performed via microbial culture. More recently, the use of polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycoplasma species from various bovine samples has increased. Polymerase chain reaction has a higher efficiency, specificity, and sensitivity for laboratory diagnosis when compared with conventional culture-based methods. Several tools are now available for typing Mycoplasma spp. isolates, allowing for genetic characterization in disease outbreak investigations. Serological diagnosis through the use of indirect ELISA allows the detection of antimycoplasma antibodies in sera and milk, with their use demonstrated on individual animal samples as well as BTM samples. While each testing method has strengths and limitations, their combined use provides complementary information, which when interpreted in conjunction with clinical signs and herd history, facilitates pathogen detection, and characterization of the disease status of cattle populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesMilkMycoplasmaMycoplasma bovisMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionSerologic TestscultureELISAmastitisPCR

Identifiers

PMID29671903
PMCPMC5980305
OpenAlexW2799743949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.