ArticleStatistics in medicine2019
Subgroups from regression trees with adjustment for prognostic effects and postselection inference.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04506528 (COVID EHR COHORT at the University of Wisconsin), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COVID EHR COHORT at the University of Wisconsin
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pseudo-value regression trees.Lifetime data analysis · 2024Article
- Tree-Values: Selective Inference for Regression Trees.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2022Article
- Predictive modeling of COPD exacerbation rates using baseline risk factors.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects in randomized trials is attracting much attention. Many methods use regression tree algorithms. This article addresses 2 important questions arising from the subgroups: how to ensure that treatment effects in subgroups are not confounded with effects of prognostic variables and how to determine the statistical significance of treatment effects in the subgroups. We address the first question by selectively including linear prognostic effects in the subgroups in a regression tree model. The second question is more difficult because it falls within the subject of postselection inference. We use a bootstrap technique to calibrate normal-theory t intervals so that their expected coverage probability, averaged over all the subgroups in a fitted model, approximates the desired confidence level. It can also provide simultaneous confidence intervals for all subgroups. The first solution is implemented in the GUIDE algorithm and is applicable to data with missing covariate values, 2 or more treatment arms, and outcomes subject to right censoring. Bootstrap calibration is applicable to any subgroup identification method; it is not restricted to regression tree models. Two real examples are used for illustration: a diabetes trial where the outcomes are completely observed but some covariate values are missing and a breast cancer trial where the outcome is right censored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.