Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29671869›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Regulation of vascular permeability in anaphylaxis.

Tatsuro Nakamura, Takahisa Murata

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection of Anaphylaxis Through the Cutaneous Barrier.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Overcoming Vascular Barriers to Improve the Theranostic Outcomes of Nanomedicines.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Dermal Microvascular Units in Domestic Pigs (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Mast Cell and Basophil Granule Proteases -Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsuro NakamuraDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahisa MurataDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-0796
Tokyo University of Agriculture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening type I allergic reaction. Antigen-antibody complexes induce mast cells, basophils and neutrophils to release large amounts of histamine and/or PAF. These mediators induce hypotension and vascular hyper-permeability and subsequent anaphylaxis dependent on the endothelial production of NO. Here, we have summarized previous studies reporting the mechanisms underlying the functional changes within the vasculature, specifically focusing on vascular permeability triggered by histamine or PAF. In addition to these pro-inflammatory factors, PGD

Indexed as

Capillary PermeabilityAnaphylaxisAnimalsEndothelium, VascularHumans

Identifiers

PMID29671869
PMCPMC6003654
OpenAlexW2801432904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.