Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29671389›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Modeling and correct the GC bias of tumor and normal WGS data for SCNA based tumor subclonal population inferring.

Yanshuo Chu, Mingxiang Teng, Yadong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanshuo ChuCenter for Bioinformatics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Mingxiang TengCenter for Bioinformatics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Yadong WangCenter for Bioinformatics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. ydwang@hit.edu.cn.

Funding

Impact of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Receptor Targeting and FunctioningR03AA020101 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CALDWELL, KEVIN K. · 2010 to 2011
$148k
NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic copy number alternations (SCNAs) can be utilized to infer tumor subclonal populations in whole genome seuqncing studies, where usually their read count ratios between tumor-normal paired samples serve as the inferring proxy. Existing SCNA based subclonal population inferring tools consider the GC bias of tumor and normal sample is of the same fature, and could be fully offset by read count ratio. However, we found that, the read count ratio on SCNA segments presents a Log linear biased pattern, which influence existing read count ratios based subclonal inferring tools performance. Currently no correction tools take into account the read ratio bias.

resultsWe present Pre-SCNAClonal, a tool that improving tumor subclonal population inferring by correcting GC-bias at SCNAs level. Pre-SCNAClonal first corrects GC bias using Markov chain Monte Carlo probability model, then accurately locates baseline DNA segments (not containing any SCNAs) with a hierarchy clustering model. We show Pre-SCNAClonal's superiority to exsiting GC-bias correction methods at any level of subclonal population.

conclusionsPre-SCNAClonal could be run independently as well as serving as pre-processing/gc-correction step in conjuntion with exsiting SCNA-based subclonal inferring tools.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticWhole Genome SequencingBase CompositionBiasCell Line, TumorClone CellsDNA Copy Number VariationsHeterozygoteHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGC biasSomatic copy number alternationSubclonal frequency

Identifiers

PMID29671389
PMCPMC5907144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.