Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29671253›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Novel Methods for Screening: Contributions from Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up.

E B Caron, Caroline K P Roben, Heather A Yarger, Mary Dozier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E B CaronDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Caroline K P RobenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
Heather A YargerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
Mary DozierDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, USA. mdozier@psych.udel.edu.

Funding

Specialized services for high-risk birth parentsR01MH074374 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY, TOTTENHAM, NIM · 2006 to 2023
$10.1M
SPECIALIZED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR FOSTER INFANTSR01MH052135 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY · 1996 to 2014
$6.7M
Early intervention for children adopted internationallyR01MH084135 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY · 2009 to 2013
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052135NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074374NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventative interventions are needed across the lifespan, including for children who have experienced maltreatment. However, interventions' effect sizes are typically smaller in real-world settings than in clinical trials. Identifying providers who are likely to implement interventions with fidelity could promote implementation outcomes through targeted allocation of training resources. This study tested two pre-training screening measures as predictors of provider fidelity to Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC), a preventative intervention for maltreated infants. One measure assessed valuing of attachment/openness, and the other used vignettes to assess initial skill in a key intervention component. In a sample of 42 providers across 197 sessions, both screening measures predicted future ABC fidelity, even when controlling for experience and education. These results support the development of screening measures for other interventions, suggesting approaches that target specific qualities and behaviors are likely to predict implementation fidelity.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorAdultChildChild AbuseFemaleHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningProcess Assessment, Health CareFidelityImplementation scienceProvider characteristicsScreening interviewsTraining

Identifiers

PMID29671253
PMCPMC6177320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.