Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29671224›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2018

Effectiveness Evaluation of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Adolescent Use of Aripiprazole in the European Union: Results from a Post-Authorization Safety Study.

Wally Landsberg, Imad Al-Dakkak, Antonia Coppin-Renz, Uli Geis, Timothy Peters-Strickland, Emiel van Heumen, Mirza Rahman

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wally LandsbergOtsuka Europe Development and Commercialization Ltd., Gallions, Wexham Springs, Framewood Road, Wexham, SL3 6PJ, UK. wlandsberg@otsuka-europe.com.
Imad Al-DakkakPope Woodhead & Associates Ltd., Cambridgeshire, PE27 5BZ, UK.
Antonia Coppin-RenzOtsuka Europe Development and Commercialization Ltd., Europa-Allee 52, 60327, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Uli GeisOtsuka Europe Development and Commercialization Ltd., Europa-Allee 52, 60327, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Timothy Peters-StricklandOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Emiel van HeumenOtsuka Europe Development and Commercialization Ltd., Europa-Allee 52, 60327, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Mirza RahmanOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Otsuka (Germany) · DEOtsuka (United States) · USOtsuka (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo risk minimization (RM) tools-a healthcare professional frequently asked questions (HCP-FAQs) brochure and a patient/caregiver information brochure (PCIB)-were developed for HCPs and for adolescents (aged ≥ 13 years) receiving aripiprazole for bipolar I mania and their caregivers.

objectivesThis study evaluated the effectiveness of these RM tools in improving the awareness and education of HCPs and patients/caregivers.

methodThe RM tools were distributed to HCPs (identified in agreement with the marketing authorization holder [MAH] and local regulatory authorities), who in turn distributed the PCIBs to patients/caregivers. A web-based survey was then conducted targeting HCPs and patients/caregivers.

resultsThe response rate was low: 118 of 23,282 invited HCPs and 16 patients/caregivers completed the survey. Overall, 42% (49/118) of HCP respondents were aware of aripiprazole RM tools; of these, 59% (29/49) of HCPs read them at least once and 66% (19/29) of these used the RM tools while discussing the benefit-risk profile of aripiprazole with patients/caregivers. In total, 30 of the 118 HCPs (25%) were aware of the PCIB, and 26 distributed it to their patients/caregivers, whereas seven HCPs advised them to read the brochure. Overall, 15 of the 16 patients/caregivers were aware of the PCIB, and 13 read/referred to it. Of these, 12 found the PCIB useful, and five monitored their weight while receiving aripiprazole and reported potential risks immediately to their HCP.

conclusionThe response rate to the survey was low, and the tools displayed limited utility and effectiveness in improving awareness and education in a small number of responders. Therefore, the aripiprazole risk management plan was amended, and the tools were discontinued.

Indexed as

European UnionAdolescentAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBipolar DisorderCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRisk AssessmentAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazole

Identifiers

PMID29671224
PMCPMC6061424
OpenAlexW2801543722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.