ArticleObesity surgery2018
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Better Long-Term Results? A Long-Term Cohort Study Until 5 Years Follow-Up in Obese and Superobese Patients.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04354532 (Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single-Centre Experience With A 4-Year Follow-Up
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and Efficacy of Single- and Two-step Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in the Setting of Obesity with ≥ 50 kg/mObesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy Plus Procedures for Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Primary Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Naturally Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Vs Non-Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy, Two Years Follow up, Controlled Clinical Trial.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Ring-Augmented Versus Non-Ring Augmented Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with BMI > 50 kg/m²: 3-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Two-Year Results of the Banded Versus Non-banded Re-sleeve Gastrectomy as a Secondary Weight Loss Procedure After the Failure of Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2023Trial
- Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study.Journal of obesity · 2020Trial
- Ring-Augmented versus Non-Ring-Augmented One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating The Impact of Ring Augmentation In Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Propensity-weighted Cohort Study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Endoscopic Management of Dysfunctioning Gastric Band after Sleeve Gastrectomy with the Luso-CorGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Banded Versus Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Results of a 3-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Long-Term Outcomes 10 Years after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single Center Retrospective Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Comparison of Sleeve Volume Between Banded and Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Midterm Effect on Weight and Food Tolerance-a Retrospective Study.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Comparison of the mid-term outcomes of banded and non-banded sleeve gastrectomy: safety, food tolerance, and weight regain.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Closed loop small bowel obstruction due to herniation through silastic ring after bariatric surgery.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Revisional Surgeries of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe failure rate of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is increasing. Gastric pouch dilation is frequently suggested to be one of the causes for the failure. The banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) has been proposed to overcome this complication. This is the first study that reports the long-term outcome (> 5 years) of BLSG in obese and superobese patient population. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred and forty-seven patients (n = 51, non-banded LSG (NLSG)/n = 96, BLSG) were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated for % excess weight loss (%EWL), % excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), weight regain, BMI, and complications. Weight loss analysis was also done between banded and non-banded superobese patient populations.
resultThere was statistical significant difference between two groups at each given time point in terms of %EWL and %EBMIL. NLSG group had higher weight loss failure rate (35.2%) and weight regain (19.6%) at the 5-year follow-up compared to BLSG group (P < 0.001). There was no statistical significant difference in weight loss between obese and superobese BLSG group. The complication rates were more with BLSG group (14.5%) compared to NLSG group (9.8%); no signs of band slippage, erosion, or migration were seen. There was no mortality seen.
conclusionBLSG surgery was found to be safe and effective in maintaining weight loss on the long term compared to the NLSG group with low incidence of band-related problems. Additionally, the NLSG group had a higher rate of weight loss failure and weight regain at 5 years compared to the BLSG group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.