ReviewJournal of neurology2018
Update on muscle disease.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Disease modeling and gene correction of LGMDR21 iPSCs elucidates the role of POGLUT1 in skeletal muscle maintenance, regeneration, and the satellite cell niche.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Article
- Clinical and pathological features of immune-mediated necrotising myopathies in a single-centre muscle biopsy cohort.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Diverse myopathological features in the congenital myasthenia syndrome with GFPT1 mutation.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Genetic modifiers and phenotypic variability in neuromuscular disorders.Journal of applied genetics · 2020Review
- KAP1-associated transcriptional inhibitory complex regulates C2C12 myoblasts differentiation and mitochondrial biogenesis via miR-133a repression.Cell death & disease · 2020Article
- [Research advances in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we highlight some of the most important developments from the last few years in the field of muscle diseases, including new additions to the congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD), advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of certain muscle disorders and progress in diagnostics and therapeutics. Unsurprisingly, the most prominent developments have come from the field of genetics, with significant advances in diagnosis and gene therapy giving hope to those with hitherto untreatable conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29671051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.